When you cast this spell, copy it for each time you've cast your commander from the command zone this game. You may choose new targets for the copies.
Copy target instant or sorcery spell. You may choose new targets for the copy.
Printings View all
|Commander 2018 (C18)||Rare|
Combos Browse all
|Commander / EDH||Legal|
Fury Storm occurrence in decks from the last year
Commander / EDH:
All decks: 0.01%
Fury Storm Discussion
5 months ago
Dual Casting , Bonus Round , Dualcaster Mage , Expansion / Explosion , Fork , Fury Storm , Increasing Vengeance , Insidious Will , Izzet Guildmage , League Guildmage , Nivix Guildmage , Reiterate and Repeated Reverberation all immediately win you the game with another instant or sorcery, Ral and your signature spell. You don't need all of these, bu adding some of the more budget-y options might be good. Most also work well with the rest of the deck. Just a thought.
7 months ago
Also for card-draw cards, why not double up on the good ones?
Deja Vu , Sage's Knowledge , The Mirari Conjecture , Archeomancer, Flood of Recollection , Mystic Retrieval , Relearn , Mnemonic Wall , Scribe of the Mindful , Spellkeeper Weird , Volcanic Vision , Shreds of Sanity , Fork , Wild Ricochet , Increasing Vengeance , Insidious Will , Narset's Reversal (super baller!), Reiterate , Reverberate , Twincast , Fury Storm , Mirror Sheen , Expansion / Explosion ,
9 months ago
Weef117, RobotCowhand: Personally I run Fury Storm . It doesn't have the "your" limitation and in almost all cases you've cast your cmdr once already so it copies twice. Have had some huge turnaround plays with this card and is a favorite of mine in this deck :) (also tutorable by sunforger)
9 months ago
You don't need the -2 ability to win with the first combo and Fury Storm . Once you casted Ral, it automatically copies itself one time, allowing you to target the original Fury storm with the copy, and start the combo.
10 months ago
I understand your mission here, but I'd really like to say... Ral with Fury Storm is an infinite and a win.
10 months ago
@bwhit89: Even if Ral, Storm Conduit was like $0.05 or if you're playing on a higher budget, it's just not good. This deck has no creatures that can protect Ral if you use him for "value." At 4 mana (a cost that cannot be reduced), the effect is not worth it as a one-shot effect. Dealing damage randomly without actually killing the opponent in one turn isn't what this deck is trying to do, so the static ability is only good as a combo, except that's a 3 card combo, which isn't great (2 or 1 card combos are better). And we already have a "copy spell" combo in Reiterate . So, tldr, no to Ral.
@zdennis: Arcane Denial is a fine card and you could play it over Mana Leak. I don't want to contribute to the endless "is Arcane Denial a good card" debate, but play it if you want. It's fine and budget.
Reset is... not a budget card.
Fury Storm looks interesting. I'd lean to the no side, for a couple reasons. First, the RR cost is pretty rough for the deck-- I know I have a few effects that are RR, but we really want to limit that. Second, it's not as good when your hand is clunky, i.e. it by itself doesn't turn an otherwise medium hand into gas. It turns a card in your hand that's gas into yet more gas. We're trying to limit effects like that. Fury Storm is one of the better versions of a card like that, so I'd probably put it in the "maybe" category.
11 months ago
Deadpoo111: I went ahead and added some ramp lands and took out some end game spells in favor of more ramp spells since they can help get the commander out faster. As for Wort being removed or countered, it definitely is a weakness of the deck, but Fury Storm can essentially help turn the tables when in that situation.
11 months ago
Also, as to questions you asked on that deck Bloodstained Chessboard a good while back, The diamonds have worked out wonderfully for escorting her majesty in early, and while the Fury Storm does drop a bit late, i've pulled some mass kills with it a few times. The other cards noted there were cut.