Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
| Format | Legality |
| 1v1 Commander | Legal |
| Archenemy | Legal |
| Arena | Legal |
| Block Constructed | Legal |
| Canadian Highlander | Legal |
| Casual | Legal |
| Commander / EDH | Legal |
| Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
| Custom | Legal |
| Duel Commander | Legal |
| Gladiator | Legal |
| Highlander | Legal |
| Historic | Legal |
| Historic Brawl | Legal |
| Legacy | Legal |
| Leviathan | Legal |
| Limited | Legal |
| Modern | Legal |
| Modern Beyond Horizons | Legal |
| Oathbreaker | Legal |
| Planar Constructed | Legal |
| Planechase | Legal |
| Quest Magic | Legal |
| Vanguard | Legal |
| Vintage | Legal |
Inferno Titan
Creature — Giant
: This gets +1/+0 until end of turn.
Whenever this enters the battlefield or attacks, this deals 3 damage divided as you choose among one, two, or three targets (creature, player, planeswalker or battle).
Amuneth on
The Dark Lord Rises
1 month ago
Replacements from Precon
Mountain => Minas Morgul, Dark Fortress
Boon of the Wish-Giver => March from the Black Gate
Deep Analysis => Call of the Ring
Goblin Dark-Dwellers => Dimir Signet
Goblin Cratermaker => Izzet Signet
Guttersnipe => Mauhur, Uruk-hai Captain
Inferno Titan => Rakdos Signet
Monstrosity of the Lake => Spiteful Banditry
Siege-Gang Commander => The Balrog, Durin's Bane
Summons of Saruman => Chromatic Lantern
Troll of Khazad-dum => Sauron, the Dark Lord
DemonDragonJ on
The Allure of Honor
3 months ago
This is definitely an excellent deck, and I like it, very much, but I do have some questions and/or suggestions; first, how does Angel of Glory's Rise fit the theme of this deck, since she does not have an ability taht triggers upon attacking? Second, would you considering putting any of the following card into this deck?: Fervent Charge, Powerstone Minefield, Grave Titan, Inferno Titan, or Sun Titan? Also, Bedlam affects your creatures, so would you consider either Goblin War Drums or Iroas, God of Victory, instead, and would you consider spending one more mana to replace Berserkers' Onslaught with Rage Reflection, or one less mana for Blade Historian, instead?
krabNOwl on
Isshin, for Kasper
8 months ago
Have been Removed: Goro-Goro, Disciple of Ryusei Heiko Yamazaki, the General Inferno Titan Ironsoul Enforcer Lizard Blades Mardu Strike Leader Sigiled Sword of Valeron Vault of the Archangel Ajani, Caller of the Pride and some lands. -Added in: Savai Triome Westvale Abbey Flip Riveteers Overlook Cabaretti Courtyard Maestros Theater Inquisitorial Rosette Myrel, Shield of Argive Commissar Severina Raine Mind Stone Sol Ring Elder Brain
Profet93 on
Godzilla, King of Monsters Budget Build
9 months ago
What is your budget per card?
Why run a signet in a 2 color deck with green? Rampant Growth/Nature's Lore are budget friendly swaps
Elemental Bond - Should budget allow, better than colossal majesty
Soul's Majesty - Budget friendly draw
Harmonize - Regula, reliable draw
Life's Legacy/Momentous Fall - Super draw, beware of the blue player however
Traverse the Outlands - ???? Or do you not have enough basics?
Sakura-Tribe Elder/Wood Elves/Nissa's Pilgrimage/Farhaven Elf - Solid ramp
Eternal Witness - Recursion
Fierce Empath - Tutor
Inferno Titan - Damage
Terastodon - Removal (that can hit pesky lands)
Decimate - 4 in 1!
Would love to hear your thoughts on each suggestion, hope this helps!
Rhadamanthus on Chef's kiss & irenicus's vile …
1 year ago
While I was typing all this out, Gidgetimer responded with basically the same thing, but I'm going with it anyway as a "+1" to their response.
You get two Inferno Titans. An effect that changes the target of a spell or ability can only change it to another legal target. If it's impossible to choose another legal target then the original target remains unchanged.
115.7a If an effect allows a player to “change the target(s)” of a spell or ability, each target can be changed only to another legal target. If a target can’t be changed to another legal target, the original target is unchanged, even if the original target is itself illegal by then. If all the targets aren’t changed to other legal targets, none of them are changed.
wallisface: The ruling about Chef's kiss possibly making a target illegal is for cases where you gaining control of the spell causes that to happen. For example, if your opponent casts Irenicus's Vile Duplication on one of their creatures and you Chef's Kiss it, you now control a spell (and a copy of it) that can only target a creature you control, is currently targeting a creature you don't control, but can't have its target changed to a creature you control. Since it isn't possible to choose a new legal target, its target won't be changed and it will fizzle for having an illegal target.
Note the ruling listed right before the one you quoted: If there are no legal targets that could be selected, the targets remain unchanged. Note that this may not mean that those targets are illegal as the spell resolves. For example, if an opponent in a two-player game has hexproof and casts Lava Spike targeting you, Chef's Kiss will not be able to change the target. However, this doesn't make you an illegal target, and both the original spell and the copy will still target you and deal 3 damage to you.
Gidgetimer on Chef's kiss & irenicus's vile …
1 year ago
That's not quite right.
The quoted ruling is speaking about a spell an opponent cast that targets "a creature you control". The original and copy in that case will not have their targets changed because there are no new legal targets. When the copy resolves it is controlled by the Chef's Kiss controller and targeting one of their opponent's creatures causing the copy to fizzle. The original will still be controlled by and targeting a creature of the opponent and will resolve normally.
Even though this ruling seems to be closer since it references a spell that targets "a creature you control". The closer one to be applied is the previous one.
"If there are no legal targets that could be selected, the targets remain unchanged. Note that this may not mean that those targets are illegal as the spell resolves. For example, if an opponent in a two-player game has hexproof and casts Lava Spike targeting you, Chef's Kiss will not be able to change the target. However, this doesn't make you an illegal target, and both the original spell and the copy will still target you and deal 3 damage to you."
The interaction in the OP creates two Inferno Titan copies.
wallisface on Chef's kiss & irenicus's vile …
1 year ago
Note that Chef's Kiss changes the target of both the original spell and the copy to targets with the stipulation that ”The new targets can't be you or a permanent you control.”.
The ruling for Chef's Kiss on Gatherer state ”Note that Chef's Kiss may make some or all of the targets of a spell illegal. For example, any spell an opponent cast that targets a "creature you control" will be unable to find a new legal target, and its target will remain unchanged. In that case, that part of the spell will do nothing. If that was the spell's only target, that spell will be removed from the stack when it tries to resolve.”.
So, what happens is that Chef's Kiss makes a copy of Irenicus's Vile Duplication and tries to change targets for both the original Chef's Kiss spell and the copy. Irenicus's Vile Duplication requires that the targets must be creatures you control, which will be at-odds with Chef's Kisses requirements, and cause all the Irenicus's Vile Duplication to fizzle.
Nothing happens and you get no Inferno Titan
DonEtch on Chef's kiss & irenicus's vile …
1 year ago
Sorry Irenicus's Vile Duplication, Chef's Kiss, Inferno Titan
| Have (3) | metalmagic , Surferdunks , TheRealSpecialK |
| Want (0) |