Absolute Virtue
Start Commander Deck

Combos Browse all Suggest

Legality

Format Legality
1v1 Commander Legal
Alchemy Legal
Archenemy Legal
Arena Legal
Block Constructed Legal
Canadian Highlander Legal
Casual Legal
Commander / EDH Legal
Commander: Rule 0 Legal
Custom Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Freeform Legal
Gladiator Legal
Highlander Legal
Historic Legal
Historic Brawl Legal
Legacy Legal
Leviathan Legal
Limited Legal
Modern Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Pioneer Legal
Planar Constructed Legal
Planechase Legal
Pre-release Legal
Quest Magic Legal
Standard Legal
Standard Brawl Legal
Vanguard Legal
Vintage Legal

Absolute Virtue

Legendary Creature — Avatar Warrior

This spell can't be countered.

Flying

You have protection from each of your opponents. ((Remember the acronym debt.) This can't be damaged, enchanted, equipped, blocked or targeted by anything controlled by your opponents. Anything controlled by your opponents attached to this immediately falls off.)

Recommendations View more recommendations

Dragoon's Wyvern
Dwarven Castle Guard
Tidus, Blitzball Star
Aerith Rescue Mission
Angel of Retribution
The Crystal's Chosen

Rhadamanthus on Card interaction Question for Commander

8 months ago

You're going to risk confusing yourself more if you think about things "targeting" when they don't actually target, because the word "target" has a specific rules meaning and whether or not something actually targets matters a lot for various card interactions and rules interactions. Declaring an attacking creature does not target. Any effect that does not specifically use the word "target" in its rules text (either printed on the card or packed into the rules for a keyword ability on the card) does not target.

The easy way to remember the full effects of protection is with the letters DEBT:

  • Damage is prevented
  • Enchanting/Equipping is not allowed (or Fortifying, but that's just one weird card from Future Sight)
  • Blocking is not allowed
  • Targeting is not allowed

The reminder text on Absolute Virtue summarizes the above and leaves out blocking since it doesn't matter (you, the player sitting there in real life, can't attack so it's irrelevant whether something can block you).

theNeroTurtle on test

8 months ago

hello

legendofa on Card interaction Question for Commander

8 months ago

As long as you have protection from opponents, you can't be targeted by any spell or ability your opponents control. So for the planeswalker example, your opponent can't choose you as a target to begin with. For an outside case like Kaya, Spirits' Justice's -2, only your creature is being targeted, not you, so it would still be exiled.

Annihilator isn't a targeting ability (it doesn't use the word "target" in its rules text or reminder text), and neither is attacking. A creature with annihilator (e.g. Ulamog's Crusher) can attack you through Absolute Virtue, and you will still sacrifice your stuff. You just won't take any damage from that creature.

theNeroTurtle on Card interaction Question for Commander

8 months ago

I have already asked about Absolute Virtue before. I can not be directly effected, but here is the question... can I still be targeted?

For example, someone can resolve a loyalty counter on a planeswalker with me as the target... it just doesn't do anything. Same thing with attacking... I can be targeted with attacking creatures during an attack phase so that triggers may occur, but won't take damage. Is this correct?

The reason I ask this is because my pod plays annihilator a lot. I want to be sure they can still target me with an attack, which would still resolve the annihilator obviously, but since I have protection, that doesn't mean they still can't target me during attack phase for triggers to occur, right?

That is what I would think. Just checking.

Rhadamanthus on Need clarification about a card …

9 months ago

The AI summary results you found were incorrect. With the way a Large Language Model (LLM) works, it's essentially doing a highly sophisticated autocomplete for a discussion about your topic. LLM responses are most reliable on topics with a lot of content represented in the training data. In this case, I get the feeling not enough has been written about effects that give a player "protection from opponents" for the LLM approach to give an accurate answer. It likely gave you results that were based on a combination of what's been written about protection in general as well as things written specifically about True-Name Nemesis, which would have had a lot more content built up over the years than Absolute Virtue has at this point.

Load more