Invisible Stalker

Invisible Stalker

View at Gatherer

Creature — Human Rogue

Hexproof

Invisible Stalker is unblockable.

Price & Acquistion Set Price Alerts

TCGPlayer.com Price Low Avg High Foil
  $0.52 $0.95 $2.11 $2.61
Cardhoarder (MTGO) Price Normal Foil
  0.06 TIX 0.15 TIX

Invisible Stalker Discussion

Leinahtan on Budget Mono Blue Control

10 hours ago

Several things: Firstly, you have seven out of sixty spells that draw cards. I don't really see the need for a Reliquary Tower in there. Either take that out, or stick in a couple card drawing spells such as Foresee or just a playset of cheap Divinations and maybe a Jace's Ingenuity or two. Also, you don't seem to have a wincon (except for your "win on turn 22" Invisible Stalker). Add in a Pearl Lake Ancient or, for a budget option, a Stormtide Leviathan. If you want to go all out, add some variation of Jace. Another thing: Control is more of a grindy game. You should add in an Elixir of Immortality to let you get your graveyard back into the game. Finally, you only have 22 land, and two of that land can only get you colorless mana. If this is supposed to be a control deck, you can't have a land makeup that is good for a control deck. Try to improve this.

Luutamo on NEW FORMAT: Battlebuddies

21 hours ago

If I understood correctly, I can see a problem with enchantments and equipments. Because the ability to split the teams up and make new ones without any cost and the fact that you can decide who gets the said enchantment/equipment, you can move them around between any of your creatures without any costs or downsides.

Example from this deck. I start with a

Birds of Paradise in play with Followed Footsteps attached to it.I also have a Giant Adephage and Invisible Stalker paired as battle buddies.

Then I split them up and pair Invisible Stalker with Birds of Paradise. Now I split them up again but I decide that Followed Footsteps will be left with Invisible Stalker instead. Then I pair Invisible Stalker back with Giant Adephage

If I understood the rules correctly, this would be completely okay thing to do and I think that this can be abused so much with other enchantments and stuff. Or did I just understand something wrong?

bprebula on Amanda's Control

1 day ago

So we tried it out with more control and she didn't like not being able to defend herself consistently. So we decided to make these adjustments.

-3x Delver of Secrets  Flip

-3x Invisible Stalker

-2x Stonewright

-4x Stubborn Denial

+3x Blistercoil Weird

+3x Assault Strobe

+2x Mutagenic Growth

+4x Spell Pierce

So far so good. She really likes being able to ramp up a creature unblockable. Now we just need to find a place for Mizzium Skin because it actually saved her Kiln Fiend when swinging double strike.

wnotting on Amanda's Control

2 days ago

Hey bprebula, long time no see. Its good to see more people learning the game! It seems to me that the deck here is trying two different things at once, both a Delver of Secrets  Flip deck and a spell based aggro deck like the Blistercoil Weird combat combo deck. I have a few ideas that would help assimilate your wife's deck type to aid in her learning process of this awesome game! Since she likes the control aspect of the game I would suggest the delver build for sure. Some of the cards i would drop to aid in this are:

Creatures:

-3x Invisible Stalker

-3x Nivix Cyclops

-2x Stonewright

+1x Monastery Swiftspear

+1x Delver of Secrets  Flip

Monastery Swiftspear and Kiln Fiend are both extremely powerful cards when paired with a few well placed spells. Where as Delver of Secrets  Flip is a very good value card being a one drop 3/2 flyer essentially. Stonewright, and Invisible Stalker actually clunk this style up, they do not benefit from any other spells being cast. Now for Nivix Cyclops, he is a very defensive creature and can benefit from your spells, but in this case he is a very pricey mana cost. You should be spending your mana gaining ground in the game or dealing with the opponents threats.

Spells:

-3x Mizzium Skin

-2x Stubborn Denial

-1x Vapor Snag

+1x Mana Leak

+3x Spell Pierce

+4x Rift Bolt

+4x Lava Spike

The reasoning for the removal of Mizzium Skin. Your creatures are not necessary to win a match, but only help speed of the pace. It would be a waste of a card slot to have creature protection main boarded. I've decreased the amount of Stubborn Denial due to the likely-hood of triggering the Ferocious ability. The only creatures to activate it would be Monastery Swiftspear or Kiln Fiend. Since it is still a possibility and a great card, two remain mainboarded. Another great counterspell in this format is Spell Pierce. Most threats in modern are low costed efficient creatures and usually when they are cast, excess mana is far and few. Also, I've dropped Vapor Snag to a three-of rather than a four-of since the ability to bounce is not always relevant. To optimize this list, the Delver decks use a bit of "burn" to assist in life damage and or creature removal. The burn spell Rift Bolt is great in a modern deck and can remove most threats and Lava Spike is another three damage that can stack up quick when your opponent is low on life.

Last but not least, Mana:

-1x Mountain

-1x Island

-2x Swiftwater Cliffs

+4 Scalding Tarn

Obviously, Scalding Tarn is a fetch land that allows you to grab either an Island or a Mountain. Unfortunately, they are a bit pricey. In this style deck you want to have at most five lands on the field, and if you draw too much land, you lose, quick... so fetching as much as possibly decreases the lands able to be drawn with will then allow you to draw removal, counters, and damage.

I hope this helps a bit with tweaking your wife's deck. Sorry for the extensive explanations, but I'd rather have people understand why and how rather than just telling someone to use this way because it's better.

smackjack on Notable cards when drafting Innistrad?

3 days ago

quesobueno123 I never drafted Innistrad so im not very sure about the limited format, but i guess Think Twice, Spectral Flight, Spare from Evil, Selfless Cathar, Doomed Traveler, Delver of Secrets  Flip, Spectral Rider, Invisible Stalker, Curiosity and Fiend Hunter are good cards..

Orvos101 on Got some Auras on my Gnarlid

6 days ago

CrovaxTheCursed I'd have to splash blue for Invisible Stalker I don't know if GWU would be spreading my color base too thin or not. I do have a play set of him though... and I'm really actually considering him...

jraynor that is actually what I've been considering. I like that someone else had that idea too. Rancor is just lac luster in this deck in my opinion. But oh how I wish I had the money for 4x Daybreak Coronet

Others have suggested that I put in a Gladecover Scout in place of my Phalanx Leader. I like how she is less "devoted" to her color and that she is a turn one drop with hexproof, What do you think of that?

CrovaxTheCursed on Got some Auras on my Gnarlid

6 days ago

That is actually a strong point; if you have protection from creatures, then Rancor is not too great of a buff, even for 1 mana. Also, have you thought about Invisible Stalker? I think he's a couple bucks a piece, but for good reason. The built-in Hexproof and Unblockable means all you have to do is make him bigger. He could go in in place of Phalanx Leader because you don't have a mass amount of creatures to benefit from his Heroic ability.

Power / Toughness 1/1
Color(s) Blue
Cost 1U
Converted cost 2
Avg. draft pick 2.07
Avg. cube pick 9.33

Legality

Format Legality
Legacy Legal
Vintage Legal
Commander / EDH Legal
Modern Legal
Duel Commander Legal

Printings View all

Set Rarity
Innistrad Uncommon

Combos

Latest Decks View more