Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
| Format | Legality |
| 1v1 Commander | Legal |
| Archenemy | Legal |
| Block Constructed | Legal |
| Canadian Highlander | Legal |
| Casual | Legal |
| Commander / EDH | Legal |
| Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
| Custom | Legal |
| Duel Commander | Legal |
| Freeform | Legal |
| Gladiator | Legal |
| Highlander | Legal |
| Legacy | Legal |
| Leviathan | Legal |
| Limited | Legal |
| Oathbreaker | Legal |
| Planar Constructed | Legal |
| Planechase | Legal |
| Quest Magic | Legal |
| Tiny Leaders | Legal |
| Vanguard | Legal |
| Vintage | Legal |
Enchanter's Bane
Enchantment
At the beginning of your end step, target enchantment deals damage equal to its converted mana cost/mana value to its controller unless that player sacrifices it.
wallisface on How Did WotC Allow Combustion …
2 months ago
DemonDragonJ not at all. Red Elemental Blast is doing effects that red shouldn’t be able to do, and the casting player has full control over being able to enact those effects.
Conversely Combustion Man and Enchanter's Bane only permit effects outside of reds colour pie in situations where the opponent refuses to pay the punisher (damage) effect. The casting player has no control over the effect of the card, and the only time the card performs an effect outside of the colours pie is when the opponent allows them to.
DemonDragonJ on How Did WotC Allow Combustion …
2 months ago
Idoneity, in that case, I take back what I said previously and regard Enchanter's Bane as a color pie break.
wallisface, I am saying that, if Red Elemental Blast is a color pie break, then Combustion Man definitely is, as well.
Idoneity on How Did WotC Allow Combustion …
2 months ago
Enchanter's Bane destroys enchantments. It gives the option to sacrifice.
DemonDragonJ on How Did WotC Allow Combustion …
2 months ago
I do not have time to respond to each individual user, here, but I have no problem with red having "punisher" cards, as I feel that they very much fit the flavor of red as a color, but those should not ever be excuses to break the color pie, as red is supposed to have difficulty in dealing with enchantments.
Idoneity, I do not regard Enchanter's Bane as a color pie break, because it does not actually destory or otherwise remove enchantments, it merely punishes a player for using them.
Idoneity on How Did WotC Allow Combustion …
2 months ago
I don't feel like writing all too much (cause I'm tired), but I wanted to point out that Red constitutes many colour pie breaks through the punishment effects listed above. Additionally, can consistently destroy or interact with any permanents except for enchantments.
I mostly just wanted to bring to mind Enchanter's Bane for this discussion. Have fun all of you.
plakjekaas on How Did WotC Allow Combustion …
2 months ago
Enchanter's Bane is a very similar effect.
Browbeat as well as Risk Factor show that trading the choice of either damage or a traditionally non-red effect has been part of Red's identity for years.
wallisface on How does Enchanter's Bane interact …
1 year ago
Enchanter's Bane has the enchantment dealing the damage. Because Fiery Emancipation only triples damage from your own sources, only your own enchantments will deal triple damage to you, if for some reason you’re targeting your own stuff with Enchanter's Bane
ArmchairRuler on How does Enchanter's Bane interact …
1 year ago
Will Enchanter's Bane allow me to deal more damage to an opponent if I have a card like Fiery Emancipation on the battlefield and I target their Doubling Season? With this interaction would I be able to have the opponent take 15 damage rather than 5 damage? The wording makes it seem like the Doubling Season would be the source of the damage so it seems like a long shot, but I am unsure of how the source of the damage is treated in this.
| Have (2) | metalmagic , Huntroid |
| Want (0) |