Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
| Format | Legality |
| 1v1 Commander | Legal |
| Archenemy | Legal |
| Canadian Highlander | Legal |
| Casual | Legal |
| Commander / EDH | Legal |
| Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
| Custom | Legal |
| Duel Commander | Legal |
| Highlander | Legal |
| Legacy | Legal |
| Leviathan | Legal |
| Limited | Legal |
| Oathbreaker | Legal |
| Planechase | Legal |
| Premodern | Legal |
| Quest Magic | Legal |
| Tiny Leaders | Legal |
| Vanguard | Legal |
| Vintage | Legal |
Dominating Licid
Creature — Licid
, : Dominating Licid loses this ability and becomes an Aura enchantment with enchant creature. Attach it to target creature. You may pay to end this effect.
You control enchanted creature.
Coward_Token on Fuck it, late Outlaw of …
3 weeks ago
Insatiable Avarice: In mono-B, this is draw three for three, which is a pretty good rate. K'rrik, Son of Yawgmoth gets Demonic Tutor + draw two for
Fortune, Loyal Steed: From reading the story, I thought he looked like the "horse" from Elden Ring so this art was pretty startling
The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride: I kinda wish he got some serious flavor again. The original premise of "edgy hypno toad" was what made him funny, but now it just feels like WotC is milking that fan reaction for all it's worth.
Great Train Heist: solid Relentless Assault variant, but I kinda wish the last one said "each" for EDH purposes, even if I know it targets for the sake of crime:ing
Gisa, the Hellraiser: WotC throwing legendofa a bone, I guess.
Olivia, Opulent Outlaw: Why would becoming a criminal make Oliva gain white of all colors? I assume this is in preparation for Assassin's Creed, but it's still pretty weird. (For reference: White outlaws within Mardu's color identity)
Final Showdown: The best spree card? In voltron decks this is basically an instant-speed Plague Wind for seven mana that doubles as a situational savingspell. I think the first mode has a lot of situational uses, but it's something you have to keep your eyes out for.
High Noon: Rule of Law upgrade for Boros+, although Deafening Silence is still a thing
Arid Archway: idk if colorless decks needed a second Guildless Commons, but sure. Would rather have a mono-colored cycle tbh.
Tomb Trawler: I'm surprised how slowly Grenzo, Dungeon Warden is accumulating these kind of cards; Cogwork Archivist missed the mark in more ways than one
Roxanne, Starfall Savant: was kinda confused about the second ability until I realized she triggers on both ETB and attack. Powerstones obviously work too, plus e.g. Svella, Ice Shaper. Edit: Oh and Treasures too, obviously
Stubborn Burrowfiend: Ahhh! What the hell is the flavor supposed to be with that art?!
Kambal, Profiteering Mayor: Pretty cool with e.g. Saw in Half, Wedding Ring, and Tombstone Stairwell
Geralf, the Fleshwright: still not a good mono-U zombie commander but seems real good in the 99
Lilah, Undefeated Slickshot: so basically a multicolor Taigam, Ojutai Master/Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch Flip? Not bad.
Caustic Bronco: Could have been Dark Confidant on steroids, but mediocre thoughness and no evasion keeps its attack trigger from being reliable
Calamity, Galloping Inferno: somehow just a normal horse, not Elemental or anything.
Eriette, the Beguiler: gogo Enchant permanent! Also, every Licid is now a Dominating Licid
Obeka, Splitter of Seconds: suck it, The Ninth Doctor!
legendofa on New Social Contract Breach Discussion
2 years ago
I have to admit, I haven't seen a lot of different opponents recently, but I'll take the other side here. Should somebody be obligated to stay ineffectual just so someone else can benefit?
Eventually, people will start losing one way or another. What difference does it make if they lose by concession, or by life = 0, or by mill? A deck that uses other people's resources will lose those resources no matter what, unless it makes a dedicated effort to keeping its opponents alive. At that point, the opponents are basically being parasitized. Is it worth their time and energy to support someone to no benefit to themselves?
If it makes a difference, I love spamming Dominating Licid and Praetor's Grasp and other "fun" cards. But if someone wants to leave, I'm not going to hold them hostage.
griffstick on Transforming creatures into Dragons
3 years ago
Ok for your opponents
- Lignify
- Kasmina's Transmutation
- Ichthyomorphosis
- Fowl Play if your playgroup allows it
- Deep Freeze
- Reprobation
- Imprisoned in the Moon
- Kenrith's Transformation
- One with the Stars
- Mystic Subdual
- Darksteel Mutation
- Song of the Dryads
So there are a series of cards from Stronghold, Exodus, and Tempest. They are creatures that transform into auras and can transform back to creatures. And they also fit the "jank" this deck has.
1moremana on
Thats mine now
3 years ago
Here are some of our recommendations:
Agent of Treachery Thalakos Deceiver Villainous Wealth Mnemonic Betrayal Dominating Licid Gonti, Lord of Luxury Keiga, the Tide Star Perplexing Chimera Puppeteer Clique Sower of Temptation Thada Adel, Acquisitor The Scarab God Thief of Sanity Animate Dead Dance of the Dead Treachery Blatant Thievery Bribery Acquire Extract from Darkness Dragonlord Silumgar Geth, Lord of the Vault
Nemesis on
4 years ago
Sorry, I wasn't really being clear. The artifact and enchantment removal can be traded with any of the ones listed. Personally I like all three of the ones I listed more than the ones you currently have.
As for the phantasmal terrain & Seasinger combo, I would definitely trade them out for something else. if you want to stick with the "steal a creature" subtheme you have going on, Dominating Licid could work as a replacement.
About the protection comment, I was talking about the artifacts along with other effects. In your list you have: Lightning Greaves , Swiftfoot Boots , Mask of Avacyn , Darksteel Plate , Whispersilk Cloak , False Demise , Diplomatic Immunity , & Regeneration . I think you may have a few too many, but this is just my personal preference.
Lastly, the deflection effects are usually pretty sumoptimal, but if they're in the deck for the theme, then I totally understand keeping them in.
rob_shifflett on
Lazav Mill, Discard, and Theivery
4 years ago
Dominating Licid is a unique target for LtM. It is a little annoying to get rid of. So awesome against targeted creature removal. The ability to end the effect doesn't use the stack. Almost no one else is going to be using it.
bj_bancroft on Substitute for Heidar (Budget Deck)
4 years ago
I am in the process of building a new mono-blue Commander deck (Given to Fly). The goal of the deck is to bounce creatures (primarily my opponents' creatures, but I can also bounce my own if it's beneficial), draw a bunch of cards, and win by a combination of slowly draining opponents with cards like Ebony Owl Netsuke and swinging against defenseless opponents with cards like Sturmgeist . I had initially intended for Heidar, Rimewind Master to be in the deck because of the cheap activated cost to bounce creatures, but as it turns out, snow-covered basic lands are expensive as hell and I don't have any. What would you recommend to replace him? I was thinking maybe something like Dominating Licid or Serendib Sorcerer , but maybe you all have better ideas. Thank you!!
nobu_the_bard on Which cards allow you to …
4 years ago
Do licids count? There's twelve of them. They let you pay to end a continuous effect; its a special action that doesn't use the stack. I think only Dominating Licid and maybe Transmogrifying Licid see much play, consider them the paragons of the type.