
Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
Format | Legality |
1v1 Commander | Legal |
Archenemy | Legal |
Arena | Legal |
Block Constructed | Legal |
Canadian Highlander | Legal |
Casual | Legal |
Commander / EDH | Legal |
Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
Custom | Legal |
Duel Commander | Legal |
Gladiator | Legal |
Highlander | Legal |
Historic | Legal |
Historic Brawl | Legal |
Legacy | Legal |
Leviathan | Legal |
Limited | Legal |
Modern | Legal |
Modern Beyond Horizons | Legal |
Oathbreaker | Legal |
Pioneer | Legal |
Planar Constructed | Legal |
Planechase | Legal |
Quest Magic | Legal |
Tiny Leaders | Legal |
Vanguard | Legal |
Vintage | Legal |
Blustersquall
Instant
Tap target creature you don't control.
Overload (You may cast this spell for its overload cost. If you do, change its text by replacing all instances of "target" with "each".)
Flarhoon13 on
Admiral Beckett Brass' High Seas Robberies
7 months ago
Oct 25 Admiral Beckett Brass' High Seas Robberies lost a long close game. Logan had to leave. Dawson eventually killed us with his Jared Carthalion, all planeswalker, Umori, the Collector companion deck. We were all at similar life totals, 8, 6 and 4 with Jesse dead in the final turn cycle. I was able to attack Dawson for 14 on my final turn. To kill him, I would have needed to crack my Glaring Spotlight for three and I thereby couldn't have enough mana to also overload Blustersquall, which would be the only way to survive the attack from Ba if I killed Dawson.
DarkKiridon on Help Me With Kefnet
1 year ago
I'm not good with mono blue but what comes to mind is:
Echoing Truth can remove creature tokens
Cards like Ever-Watching Threshold and Propaganda could help.
Hope this helps a little.
MrNoCards on
Ezuri, Claw of Smiles
2 years ago
DraconicDestruction Kami of Whispered Hopes seems like a great addition. I will have to acquire a copy and play test with it, if I can manage to find a card to remove. Thank you for your suggestion and the time you spent looking through my deck.
Vicarian I hesitate to remove a card draw engine as I'm not fond of top decking, and drawing cards is fun. This deck is pretty creature heavy, with 41 creatures. Even though Guardian Project doesn't trigger from tokens, it has proven to be a valuable draw engine. As for Blustersquall, this is meant to be a friendly Cyclonic Rift replacement. While Blustersquall does not return everything to hand. It does allow me to attack through without worry, as my playgroup does tend to go wide. Thank you for your time and effort in reviewing my deck and taking the time to reply.
MurficWPN on
Koma, Cosmos Serpent - Clones
2 years ago
I play the deck fairly regularly and I think I've only put together both Abundance + Sylvan Library
twice, but both are quite good on their own in the deck.
Abundance really shines when you're drawing 4+ cards per turn rotation.
Noxious Revival is in the deck for recursion with the option of messing with your opponents just as you mentioned.
Blustersquall was a later addition to the deck. I found that I was often winning off the back of a well timed Cryptic Command with the mode 'Tap all creatures your opponents control' so I wanted other ways to duplicate the effect.
I think Opposition would be a great include for the deck but would lead to a more controlling style of play. If you look at the Sideboard section I have it included in what I think would make a stronger deck, you'd just need to cut a few of the higher CMC creatures and some of my less synergistic includes.
Profet93 on
Koma, Cosmos Serpent - Clones
2 years ago
Oops, I mistakenly thought that your commander 1/1s for some reason. You're absolutely right.
I notice you're running Sylvan Library + Abundance, nice! How often have you assembled that synergy?
What is the primary purpose of Noxious Revival? I'm assuming it's to mess with opposing graveyard shenanigans while tappedout? Or is it's primary purpose recursion?
Blustersquall - How has this been working out for you? Why not swap it for Opposition? They are similar, bluster has a lower ceiling but higher floor while opposition is the opposite. Repeatable interaction > One time IMO. I do see the utility in this though. Would love to hear your thoughts.
Vicarian on
Ezuri, Claw of Smiles
2 years ago
I'd take out Guardian Project and Blustersquall for the two cards you wanted to fit in. Guardian Project doesn't trigger off tokens entering, and Blustersquall strikes me as too situational given you're likely making way more attackers than your opponents will have blockers.
kamarupa on
Protect the kingdom
3 years ago
more counterspells, add draw card/scry/tutor, and remove some creatures or use your creatures for better utility abilities like counterspell, draw card, removal, etc. Defenders can't protect your Azor's Elocutors from removal and by turn 5, you're likely to have used any Counterspells you've drawn.
Send Wingcrafter to the sideboard.
Wall of Omens seems to fit your theme of defensive creatures and it cantrips, which you definitely want to help cycle through the deck to get to your wincon. I don't think this is a great direction to go, but I think it's better than at least one of the defenders you're already including.
Judge's Familiar (maybeboard) won't be good unless you can pump it.
Cut Ring of Three Wishes, as its MV to cast and activate are just way too high.
Some of these spells and their ilk would be good here: Blustersquall, Mana Leak, Serum Visions, Delver of Secrets Flip.
Have (0) | |
Want (1) | beesaurs |