Combos Browse all Suggest
- Agent of Treachery + Cackling Counterpart
- Agent of Treachery + Deadeye Navigator
- Agent of Treachery + Ghostly Flicker + Scholar of the Ages
Legality
| Format | Legality |
| 1v1 Commander | Legal |
| Archenemy | Legal |
| Arena | Legal |
| Block Constructed | Legal |
| Canadian Highlander | Legal |
| Casual | Legal |
| Commander / EDH | Legal |
| Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
| Custom | Legal |
| Duel Commander | Legal |
| Freeform | Legal |
| Gladiator | Legal |
| Highlander | Legal |
| Legacy | Legal |
| Leviathan | Legal |
| Limited | Legal |
| Modern | Legal |
| Modern Beyond Horizons | Legal |
| Oathbreaker | Legal |
| Pioneer | Legal |
| Planar Constructed | Legal |
| Planechase | Legal |
| Quest Magic | Legal |
| Vanguard | Legal |
| Vintage | Legal |
Agent of Treachery
Creature — Human Rogue
When this enters, gain control of target permanent.
At the beginning of your end step, if you control three or more permanents you don't own, draw three cards.
Neotrup on What happens if I cast …
4 weeks ago
You're clones will always enter as copies of Agent of Treachery. What Rhadamanthus said is largely correct, however, if you choose to apply Infinite Reflection's replacement effect first, Clone will now be entering as Agent of Treachery and no longer have it's own ability, so that replacement effect no longer applies and you end up with Agent of Treachery. If you apply Clone's effect first, you'll then have to apply Infinite Reflection's ability as it's still relevant, and end up with Agent of Treachery.
ContraMundi on What happens if I cast …
4 weeks ago
Hi,
Let's say I have Agent of Treachery on the field and Infinite Reflection attached to it. I then cast a clone copying an opponents creature that also has an ETB effect.
I know that I can choose which effect resolves first since I have priority but will I get the ETB effects of both creatures, the one the clone is copying and Agent of Treachery?
And what happens to my clone when Infinite Refelction leaves the battlefield? Will the clone then revert to the creature it originally copied?
Thank you!
Taida on
That's a real nice deck ya got there
8 months ago
Nice concept of deck. One thing that other comments have mentioned, you are a bit split between something more akin to a Voltron deck and killing everybody with Commander damage and gracefully "borrowing" their library. In my oppinion the latter is the more interesting one, so its good to see a few dose of unblockable effects and doubling the triggers. To follow with this, I would add some more like Prowler's Helm or Whispersilk Cloak for equipments, or Adric, Mathematical Genius and Lithoform Engine for the triggers.
Now for using the graciously conceded cards from your opponents, I suggest Gonti, Night Minister, you end up generating a ton of treasures for free; and you can also include Agent of Treachery, not really for the first effect, but for allowing you to draw a lot of cards, keeping your hand full. I also do not think you will struggle with paying 7 mana for it, seeing how much ramp you have already in the deck.
For counters, I do not like Arcane Denial. In its place (and in general) I like to add counters that do not stay dead in your hand if you don't have a good target for them. Three Steps Ahead, Spellgyre, Archmage's Charm or Sublime Epiphany.
I also feel that the deck could benefit greatly from some tutors, as getting some of the trigger doublers, a protection or interaction piece or just the more game-ending equipments/auras like Eldrazi Conscription whenever you need them makes such a difference.
Finally, I would heavily the inclusion of MDFC lands. Even very cheap Zendikar ones. They are so flexible and don't become a dead card in your hand if you end up drawing them later in the game.
DreadKhan on What makes a card or …
1 year ago
I like to build some fairly toxic Commander decks, though I try to warn people if a deck dips too deeply into any of the elements I've noticed that cause toxicity. In Commander most people consider decks that take away player agency to be toxic, so that includes;
-excessive permanent removal (clearing each opponent's board repeatedly, or Obliterate/Jokulhaups)
-things that limit what you can do (like Rule of Law or Collector Ouphe)
-excessively pushed Commanders in Casual (stuff where they throw Ward on for no reason, most of these are also the payoff and enabler in one card)
-Chaos effects that turn the game on it's head (Thieves' Auction and Grip of Chaos for example)
-stuff that prevents untapping (Static Orb
and Winter Orb)
-stealing everything strategies (flickering Agent of Treachery infinitely, Insurrection late game)
-excessive discard (multiple Necrogen Mists and Bottomless Pit effects)
-'win on the spot' effects that don't have an upkeep trigger (there is a few of these on the banlist, like Biorhythm and Coalition Victory)
-counter everything strategies (Dovescape)
-overly efficient tutoring (Zur the Enchanter *f-etch* fetching out Necropotence, and people are weirdly salty about Vampiric Tutor)
-faster elimination strategies that encourage you to target a specific opponent (think anything Infect, and lower to the ground Voltron decks)
-I think the last one I can think of is optional tax effects that encourage people to screw their pod and play into the Rhystic Study, if the tax is just a tax, like Thalia, Guardian of Thraben people tend not to mind as much, it's the ability to king make if you're dumb.
In 1v1 I don't think it really matters, unless you only have 1 deck to play kitchen table with just changing decks should generate enough novelty to avoid the build up of bad feelings, and if you're playing competitively it's your call if you want to play nightmarish stuff like Nadu, or something traditionally 'fun' like Aggro... only if everyone plays decks that aren't fun, more people will quit, so it's a 'tragedy of the commons' scenario too if you have a fairly small meta each player needs 'fun to play against' decks, even for 1v1.
builderboy7 on Player's Dying with No Mercy
1 year ago
Player A has gained control of No Mercy from Player B's board with Agent of Treachery. Player C attacks with Storm Crow for lethal at Player A. With my understanding of the rules regarding player deaths, No Mercy would return to Player B's control and No Mercy would not kill Storm Crow?
Taida on
1 year ago
You might like Fallen Shinobi in place of Dragonlord Silumgar. It is not a perfect substitution, but I think your deck can easily get some unblocked creatures and ninjutsu it, and the cards you steal can be cast without paying the manacost, so avoids any problem with colored mana. Agent of Treachery is also very cool, but might have the same problem with manacosts as Dragonlord Silumgar, but has the upside of having an effect that is repeated through the turns and also you keep the permanents even if Agent of Treachery leaves the battlefield.
Also, I see the idea behind preferring Bloodchief's Thirst, but instant speed removal can be very helpful, and even though Fatal Push cannot hit creatures as big as Bloodchief's Thirst can, the instant speed makes for it definitely. You can always run something like Infernal Grasp, but for 2 mana you will always have a downside.
DreadKhan on Interaction between Brago, King Eternal …
2 years ago
Not sure if this is helpful, but I think Brago can flicker an Agent of Treachery over and over, Agent has no return clause.
| Have (0) | |
| Want (1) | flop123 |

