Prohibit

Combos Browse all Suggest

Legality

Format Legality
1v1 Commander Legal
Archenemy Legal
Arena Legal
Block Constructed Legal
Canadian Highlander Legal
Casual Legal
Commander / EDH Legal
Commander: Rule 0 Legal
Custom Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Gladiator Legal
Highlander Legal
Historic Legal
Legacy Legal
Leviathan Legal
Limited Legal
Modern Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Pauper Legal
Pauper Duel Commander Legal
Pauper EDH Legal
Planechase Legal
Premodern Legal
Quest Magic Legal
Tiny Leaders Legal
Vanguard Legal
Vintage Legal

Prohibit

Instant

Kicker (You may pay an additional as you cast this spell.)

Counter target spell if its converted mana cost is 2 or less. If this spell was kicked, counter that spell if its converted mana cost is 4 or less instead.

BruhYouFarted on

1 year ago

Wish it weren't true, but Counterspell is probably just better than Logic Knot; with the only upside being corner-cases like playing vs. Prohibit

svensparx07 on Verazol BUDGET Kicker Commander

3 years ago

Love the deck, been thinking about Verazol for a hot minute

If you were to raise the budget to about $150-200, what would you add/remove?

I've been looking at Rite of Replication, Prohibit, Mana Reflection, Spell Contortion, Draining Whelk, Elfhame Druid, and Breeding Pool

kalko on

3 years ago

Please dont play contingency plan, if you want that effect play thoughtscour.

I would add some Ash Barrens as it can give you the mana you need as soon as you want it. also maybe some bouncelands instead of gainlands but only 2 or 3.

Prohibit might be a good idea since you dont always have double U.

sten94 on Sultai Delver

4 years ago

This looks better. I would probably just put the Collector Ouphe 's in the sideboard instead of the Force of Vigor 's because they fill a similar role only you don't have many cards to pitch to the Force of Vigor so most of the time will find you are just hard casting it with it's bad mana cost. In it's place you probably still need the the 3 Prohibit and running the force of negation means you probably don't need the 3 Negate as again it's a lot of sideboard slots dedicated to doing the same role.

Degaine on 85-card Teachings Creatureless Control

5 years ago

Hmmm... Maybe I'll say it this way - I like to play for fun and with stupid ideas, but if I play some kind of daw-go, then I want to play only (almost) unconditional counterspels and removals like Prohibit or excludes and Rend Flesh , Ashes to Ashes or sac effects, instead of essence scatter and doom blade. I just want to be able to kill gurmag with every or at least "most" of my spells. Yea, prohibit doesn't hit him, but this card can counter a lot of cards in this format. Prohibit is pauper version of Spell Snare in modern. Or even better!

I personally love prohibit and most of the time my decks are little "kinky", because I play to much counterspels - 4 counterspell, 4 excludes and 2-4 prohibits, but there is only one excuse. My local meta is control heavy, so my deck can be a little slower :)

And answering your question - no, not prohibits. I would cut preordians instead, but am not a big fan of card selection in draw-creatureless-go, so probably I can't be helpful here...

sceptikal on 85-card Teachings Creatureless Control

5 years ago

Degaine: I definitely want 4x Exclude , I've just been worried about not having enough two-mana interaction. Would you recommend removing Prohibit to fill out the playset or taking out some removal spells?

I've been testing Think Twice over the past few days actually, and I'm definitely liking it more than AK. I wanted to test it for longer before making any changes, but I'm definitely loving it so far.

You're right, the category should be "Deck Filtering." I fixed it.

Daedalus19876 on Simic Flash •2022•

5 years ago

Unless I’m missing something (I am not a Pauper player) I’d rather have 2 more copies of Mana Leak than the two Prohibit, and I’d run a third Brainstorm over Devious Cover-Up (I am not a fan of 4-Mana counterspells).

Load more
Have (1) reikitavi
Want (0)