Doubling Season

Doubling Season

Enchantment

If an effect would create one or more tokens under your control, it creates twice that many of those tokens instead.

If an effect would put one or more counters on a permanent you control, it puts twice that many of those counters on that permanent instead.

Browse Alters

Trade

Have (1) Azdranax
Want (9) zero820 , Corruptions_Desire , chalrain , TheMagicFanatic , DeckBuilderRiot , leon_bulminot , Lightwatch , crunchyleaf , meow7mix

Printings View all

Set Rarity
Double Masters (2XM) Mythic Rare
Battlebond (BBD) Mythic Rare
Modern Masters (MMA) Rare
Ravnica: City of Guilds (RAV) Rare
Promo Set (000) Rare

Combos Browse all

Legality

Format Legality
Vintage Legal
Commander / EDH Legal
Tiny Leaders Legal
Highlander Legal
Limited Legal
Leviathan Legal
1v1 Commander Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Modern Legal
Block Constructed Legal
Canadian Highlander Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Casual Legal
Unformat Legal
2019-10-04 Legal
Legacy Legal

Latest Decks as Commander

Doubling Season Discussion

PirateCptAstera on Vraska, Horse Queen

2 days ago

possibly one year too late, but a couple of things i noticed in this deck:

  1. Is there a specific use for Windswept Heath and Wooded Foothills? You would be better off with Verdant Catacombs, Twilight Mire or Tainted Wood.

  2. And if your sole purpose is to get Vraska to Ult, I would consider using Doubling Season since Vraska would come in with double her loyalty counters. That way you could set up the combo of: have Doubling Season and either Evolution Sage or Karn's Bastion in play, bring out Vraska, Golgari Queen, play a land (if making use of the sage) and proliferate Vraska. Ult Vraska straight away giving your opponents less time to respond to her.

_Arra_ on [[Primer v3.5]] - OM_RATH!!! (M21 Update!!!)

4 days ago

Hey BenWin, thanks for the shout out. As you wrote a long post I thought it fair I do the same in reply.

I want to respond to your comment as I think there is a lot you are overlooking in your analysis, most of which is on point. However, you mentioned a few cards now a couple of times so I want to break these down a bit as you have gone to the effort to write an extensive comment.

  1. Firstly I'd like to address your comment on Burgeoning + Ghost Town which you've shown your self to be an big advocate of. These are great cards and on paper seem to be great additions to the deck as they appear to enable one of our main objectives which is landfall triggers. However, the reason I think these cards have fallen out of favour is because they're very situational. Let me expand on that. If you do not have an opening hand with Burgeoning and a number of lands and a way to refill your hand (a very specific situation) the card is lackluster. Yes it is great if our opponents are constantly playing lands and we have Ghost Town and Burgeoning but this is honestly rarely the case. They are a weak draw 90% of the time. Even with Burgeoning in our opening hand as we do not have built in card draw we stall. Even with the increased draw effects provided by Zendikar Rising I do not think it is worth the spots.

  2. Calling the removal of Perilous Forays crazy talk seems strange to me. The CMC of this card is 5, ideally we want to wait until Omnath, Locus of Rage is out before we play it so dodge removal. Even more ideally we want Amulet of Vigor in hand/on the battlefield too. My second gripe with the card is that once we have ramped a couple of times, played land each turn and then got into a position to 'combo off' with Perilous Forays most of the time the number of basics in our deck barely makes it worth while as it effectively switches off all our remaining ramp spells. There have been so many times I have 'gone off' with Perilous Forays and not killed a single opponent and left myself in a worse position. In my experience as this deck has evolved, and I have actually been playing it weekly since BFZ launch this card no longer packs the punch it once did.

  3. I agree with you on Force of Vigor, this deck is extremely lean on interaction and removal as it is. This card is too strong to exclude.

  4. Regarding Ancient Greenwarden and Doubling Season being enablers for 'overrun' type strategy I can't disagree with you more on this. We want to make 5/5 tokens on mass as we want to either trigger Warstorm Surge, Terror of the Peaks or Where Ancients Tread and/or we want to sac then to Omnath, Locus of Rage to bolt our opponents to death. We need a critical mass of 5/5s so that we can deliver enough damage to face. Mass elemental tokens also gives us sudo protection from board wipes. I know you're playing devils advocate here but no, in my opinion these cards generate huge value for Omnath generally not for a specific strategy.

  5. Your comment on Nahiri's Lithoforming I find interesting as this is exactly my point on Perilous Forays and Burgeoning but my opinion is that Nahiri's Lithoforming is a great card almost all the time whereas the other cards I have mentioned are not. This card is gas with Titania, Protector of Argoth on the battlefield, if we have a decent hand already we are 80-90% certain to have lands to replay or draw into a land recursion effect like Crucible of Worlds or Splendid Reclamation. Not as good as Scapeshift obviously but I think you are underestimating the power of the card. Of course, play testing will tell us either way and I'll be interested to see if this card doesn't work out, which is might not, but I think until another land-centric draw card comes out this one is going to do Omnath just fine.

  6. I haven't decided whether I am going to play Roiling Regrowth yet but I don't agree with your pros and cons analysis. The assumption that is worse than Springbloom Druid I don't think is accurate. Instant speed is a premium and shouldn't be under valued especially if you're playing with a pod with interaction etc. Getting Omnath triggers at instant speed is great and you can dodge opponents interaction. Your comments on the 4cmc ramp spells, I think these cards are just fine and fair. Not exceptional but not bad, Migration Path with cycling is a nice bonus. If these 4cmc ramp spells were instant, what would you think then?

  7. Moraug, Fury of Akoum might just a be great additional line this deck can take. If the board state allows for it Chord of Calling this beast into play on an end step might be game winning. I am really on the fence as I'd really want a haste enabler to really break the card but honestly it might be fine by itself.

  8. I ran Tooth and Nail for a long time with various different finishers and yeah it wins but it is not that fun a victory unless you count the time I have Omnath and Titania out and entwined It That Betrays and Keldon Firebombers into play, that was fun! It really depends what you want from Omnath. Omnath isn't my competitive deck. It is my pubstompy deck to pull out when people are bitch about one thing or another. If I want to combo to win I play one of my other decks. Each to their own though. Tooth and Nail wins games its just not for me and Sekki, Seasons' Guide is pretty weak the rest of the times you draw it.

  9. I think your comment on non basic land search is spot on, we need more. I just don't think that there is currently any ones good enough for the deck other than Crop Rotation and Scapeshift, we just need to wait for better non basic search to be printed. A 2cmc Crop Rotation would be nice.

  10. My issue with Skullclamp and Sensei's Divining Top is that they are not actively winning the game. If I were to include Top in my deck it would more often that not end up being a 2 mana brainstorm as I would likely shuffle it away with a fetch. Green Red doesn't have the draw that other decks have that can really abuse Top, it ends up slowing us down. Skullclamp is great value but I just don't think we'e a Skullclamp deck. I'd rather the slot for something that is enabling a win by synergising with the rest of our deck, Skullclamp doesn't, it is just value. Sure you can play it but it is detracting from what Omnath is trying to do in my opinion. You're also going to get a lot more hurt from Null Rods and Collector Ouphes out there. We have an advantage that a lot of hate doesn't really effect us. Apart from Humility of course which kinda hard counters Omnath most of the time :(

All of this discussion is what makes Omnath such a great general as there are so many viable build options.

0rc on +1+1 Bant

4 days ago

Nice list. Here’s my suggestions: Doubling Season (you’re running craterhoof so I don’t see how this shouldn’t be included), Karn's Bastion (not great but is sometimes just enough), Gilder Bairn + Paradise Mantle (can be infinite with another enabler but good enough as is). You should consider running any other decent walkers that ult at 2x devotion. Look at The Ozolith as well.

Gidgetimer on Does the 1/1 counter from …

6 days ago

You can link cards by enclosing them in double brackets.

Deep Forest Hermit

Deep Forest Hermit doesn't give the squirrels counters. It provides a static buff for as long as it is on the battlefield. The squirrels will lose the buff when the Hermit leaves the battlefield. Anything that interacts with counters (Doubling Season, Tayam, Luminous Enigma, The SBA that removes +1/+1 counters and -1/-1 counters if they are on the same creature, etc.) will not interact with the static buff.

LandoLRodriguez on Windy Kitty's Landfall Engine

6 days ago

Changes, 20Sep2020:

-1 Swamp, +1 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth. Urborg has some nice utility, something of a mana fixing effect, and outside the presence of a Blood Moon, I don't see a ton of drawback in slotting it in, besides one fewer basic to fetch with lands that only get basics. I can live with that, since...

-1 Seer's Sundial, +1 Dread Presence. With now two routes to make every land drop a swamp, this guy makes a ton of sense. The sundial is gonna cost at least 6 mana before it starts to pay off and adds pretty much nothing when it first enters play. I see Dread Presence offering much more drawing power at a greatly reduced cost, along with other utility from its other effect, and I can grab him with creature searching/recurring tools.

-1 In Garruk's Wake, +1 Doubling Season. Let me say this: I love just about everything about IGW. I love the brutality of its effect. I love the name, the art, the flavor, and the MtG lore from whence it came. I don't particularly love the heavy cost, but considering the effect it can have on a game - especially a multiplayer game - it's not really unfair. However, at the time I'm making this change, there are a total of 18 cards that would benefit from Doubling Season, and it should have a profound effect on every game it enters. I foresee IGW spending a lot of time in my hand, either waiting for enough mana to pay for it, or waiting for a time when it feels worth it to spend that mana. Doubling Season is a fun card and I love the potential for exponential growth (one land drop can turn into 4 dragons with Nesting Dragon, plus the havoc it will create once I can get my hands on an Ancient Greenwarden).

BenWin on [[Primer v3.5]] - OM_RATH!!! (M21 Update!!!)

1 week ago

VexenX, I love the new conversation sparked by Zendikar Rising! When deck-building or adding new cards, I think it's important to revisit our win-cons. As it stands, I believe your deck has two types of win cons: burn and creature overrun. Ever since the removal of Akroma's Memorial and addition of Fiery Emancipation, I've come around to the fact that Burn is a more competitive win con. Would you disagree?

Next, since Omrath runs little removal, I believe that we should be in the mindset of designing a deck that works towards its strengths more than patching its weaknesses. This way, our goal should be to put pressure on our opponents and win as quickly as possible. You can see where I'm going with all this, as I am suggesting cuts to creature overrun enhancing cards and keeping/adding burn enhancing cards.

A few comments on your new card update post:

1) I 100% agree with Valakut Exploration. Although card draw is neat, you and everyone else on this page may be underestimating just how good the burn value can be! Because the damage is dealt to "each" opponent, we have a mini Purphoros, God of the Forge on our hands. Since Valakut Exploration burn is triggered by landfall, it works especially well with - you guessed it - Burgeoning + Ghost Town! And the more creature overrun enhancing cards like Doubling Season we slot out for cheaper draw-into-hand cards, the more smoothly Burgeoning works in the deck just by itself. And the more cheap draw-into-hand cards we have in the deck, the more likely we are to cast the cards we draw off of Valakut Exploration. Ahh!!! Okay rant done.

2) I feel like slotting out Perilous Forays is crazy talk. Other sac outlets need Omnath, Locus of Rage AND creatures to sac to take effect. Perilous Forays only needs Omnath, Locus of Rage in play - plus an upside of comboing off - plus an upside of working towards the burn win con.

3) I can see slotting out Force of Vigor. It is a flex card after all. Personally, I think 0 mana removal is too broken to cut through.

4) Ancient Greenwarden may be a godlike card, but I'd like to play devil's advocate and remind you that it is both expensive and plays towards a creature overrun win con just like Doubling Season. I respect and even back your choice to add this card, but I think it's just a little clunky and on the for-fun side.

5) Isn't Roiling Regrowth a strictly worse Springbloom Druid? Not that I'm against adding more cheap mana ramp, but I would personally add Springbloom Druid back first. For the record, I do agree with Ranger's Path being on the chopping block. Same goes for Migration Path. On paper they look just fine. In testing, I'd be happy to see one or both go.

6) I'm worried that Nahiri's Lithoforming may de-ramp us in some games resulting in an autoloss. The risk is too high for this card in too many hand states in my opinion.

7) I think Moraug, Fury of Akoum is a great reason to be back IN for the creature overrun win con. However, it benefits greatly from Doubling Season effects and doesn't synergize at all with Where Ancients Tread or sacrificing effects. This once again comes down to priority of win cons. If we're more in burn, which I personally believe us to be, than I would recommend against this.

Next, I'd like your thoughts on a few cards as additions to the deck if you wouldn't mind!

1) Full credits to _Arra_ and Rasaru (at least): Add Sekki, Seasons' Guide + Tooth and Nail. As explained by Rasaru, the combo goes as follows:

1) Play Tooth and Nail, paying it's entwine cost (9 cmc total - which is nothing for this deck)

2) Search for Sekki, Seasons' Guide and Terror of the Peaks

3) When they both hit the battlefield, Terror will see Sekki and trigger causing 8 dmg to a target. In this case, point that damage right back at Sekki.

4) Sekki will lose all of it's counters, creating 8x 1/1 faeries and going to the graveyard.

5) Terror sees these 8 faeries coming in, pointing this 8 damage at a player's face.

6) Then sac all 8 faeries to bring Sekki back. (Sekki's last ability is played from the grave)

7) Rinse and repeat for an infinite damage combo.

In my opinion, adding 1 card to the deck, Sekki, Seasons' Guide, isn't a tall ask for an extra infinite combo in the deck. We already have creature tutors, so Tooth and Nail isn't even required. But after the addition of Sekki, Seasons' Guide, adding 1 more card, Tooth and Nail, instantly wins us many games when we draw it for just 9 mana. Not only do I think you could cut Craterhoof Behemoth for this combo but Craterhoof Behemoth works towards a creature overrun win con, so I'd argue it's on the chopping block anyways! You could use Avenger of Zendikar and Purphoros, God of the Forge as backup Tooth and Nail targets for the burn win con. To take this one step further, with the addition of a card that can win us the game if resolved, why not run Gamble? Twice the chance to draw into a quick and easy win con with added upside of 1 cmc and flexibility.

2) Thoughts on Skullclamp? I think it's a disgustingly good card for draw and we already have sac outlets to trigger it.

3) Thoughts on re-adding Sylvan Scrying? Ever since the removal of Tempt with Discovery, I've been missing nonbasic land tutors. Lets compare Sylvan Scrying to Rampant Growth. Rampant Growth gives us 1 mana ramp for 2 mana to use as early as turn 3. Sylvan Scrying at the very least does the same if we search up Ancient Tomb. And I think it has so much more upside if we draw it mid or late game too.

4) Thoughts on Sensei's Divining Top? I think it feels great to draw in opening hand and makes early game even more consistent.

Thanks for your time in answering my posts. I know they can be a little long!

ChernoBillv2 on Cannibal Dragons

1 week ago

I've tried your deck with some friends and it's really strong and fun, I would suggest substituting 1 Migration Path and 1 Grow from the Ashes with 2 Doubling Season for a shitton of tokens and damage with Dragon Tempest

DeinoStinkus on Strange Tales #1 - War …

1 week ago

Strange Tales #1

Hello everyone. I’m DeinoStinkus, TappedOut’s resident crocodile and ultimate master of jank and underappreciated strategies. This is the article series Strange Tales, where we’ll be exploring everything custom, from the craziest custom cards and user-made formats to wild speculation and analysis of sets.

Today, we will be looking at the wonderful world of War of the Spark. Is it underrated? Yes. Is it brilliantly designed? Yes. Were there issues regarding communication between the story and card design? Unfortunately, the answer is also yes. War of the Spark was a letdown in some respects, but many overlook the fact that it not only contributed massively to Standard archetypes but it also introduced many unique and underestimated cards.

To take a look at War of the Spark, we must first examine the mechanic known as amass. Amass, found on cards like Dreadhorde Invasion and my favorite, Eternal Skylord, is a mechanic that allows you to emulate the creation of an army. Flavorfully potent and a decent mechanic, although unfortunately it probably won’t be reprinted as it was a very specific ability that fitted War of the Spark very well, but not much else. The most likely plane for amass to return to is Innistrad, but even that seems very improbable. Amass as a mechanic is fairly powerful, especially when compared to mechanics like trample or first strike. It generates a creature or makes it stronger. Its interaction with cards like Doubling Season or The Ozolith is interesting and makes for a neat and fun way to play. Unfortunately, amass did not have any cards that are sufficiently powerful enough for competitive play, except Dreadhorde Invasion in niche decks. Lazotep Plating is decently powerful, but Heroic Intervention beats it in every way, unfortunately. Amass as a mechanic needed better support in my opinion, and cards that helped amass synergies rather than simply having amass would have helped. The Grixis-colored cycle of “Zombie Armies have {insert keyword}” was a good try, but only Eternal Skylord really stands out. Deathtouch is counterintuitive for a massive army to have, trample is kind of decent, but only flying is a powerful enough evasion ability to be worth the mana investment of the creature. Amass isn’t very powerful when combined with blink effects, mostly due to the highest amass X being printed on a creature being 2. Overall, despite amass’s potent effect, it did not make it very far due to a general lack of support. Widespread Brutality was too underpowered, Enter the God-Eternals had it as a side thought, and even Invade the City was simply a big creature. Amass, while an amazing and well-built mechanic, did have shortcomings in the long run.

The return of proliferate, however, was much better in this set. The strangest thing about this is that despite proliferate being a very-well supported mechanic there is not a single rare in War of the Spark that has the word proliferate on it. Roalesk, Apex Hybrid is the only mythic with the ability. While this is strange, there are many synergies that exist within the rare slot to be supported by proliferate, a few examples being Krenko, Tin Street Kingpin and Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi. Proliferate even adds its own power to amass, despite a small discontinuity between their colors (proliferate was in GWU in this set while amass was in UBR) and this synergy is part of the reason why War of the Spark Limited is painfully easy to draft.

Let’s talk power level.

Teferi, Time Raveler, Finale of Devastation, and Liliana, Dreadhorde General stand out as the three most powerful cards from the set. Teferi defined Standard for a long time, giving control decks a (rather annoying) tempo play that allowed them to execute their game strategy without delay. Devastation actually did not hit Standard very hard. Its power level (and by association its price) have been mainly due to Commander players. In Commander, this Finale is better than Green Sun's Zenith in every way except mana cost. It searches graveyards, it doesn’t have the color limitations, and let’s be honest, the “final” cost of the spell essentially says “I win the game”. Dreadhorde General is an incredible enabler for Aristocrats. Her passive is generous, her +1 is fodder for her -4 which is bonkers and breaks parity very easily, and her -9 is a pretty decent ultimate, but not super beneficial for her passive. These three cards have each stayed at around $20 recently. They are the face of War.

However, we must not forget that War of the Spark introduced quite a few cards that people still use today, even if they are not equipped with $20 price tags. They include Nicol Bolas, Dragon-God, an amazing flavor win and a really neat planeswalker, Arboreal Grazer, a cute ramp card that sees play in a lot of Commander and Standard decks, and Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner, a neat Elemental Bond/Kiora's Follower crossover that makes Simic stompy players feel jiggy.

Overall, War of the Spark was a set that was really good. People often take it for granted, and look to sets such as Double Masters or Throne of Eldraine as the best sets of recent times. But War of the Spark not only managed to end an era of Magic: the Gathering lore, it also created some really neat cards in the process, and brought many amazing characters together in a unique way. It’s hard to pull off something like that.

Thanks for reading my article! Feel free to leave some feedback below or contact me about any ideas you have for future articles, I plan them one in advance. My email is [email protected] if you want to reach me that way. If not, have a good day, be cool and kind to everyone, and GIVE ALL YOUR WORLDLY POSSESSIONS TO Omniscience_is_life, a cool and funny deckbuilder whom I have had a lot of fun times with on the site. See you next time where we will talk about a subject that often generates some controversy in the MTG community: custom cards! See you then!

Load more