Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
| Format | Legality |
| 1v1 Commander | Legal |
| Alchemy | Legal |
| Archenemy | Legal |
| Arena | Legal |
| Block Constructed | Legal |
| Brawl | Legal |
| Canadian Highlander | Legal |
| Casual | Legal |
| Commander / EDH | Legal |
| Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
| Custom | Legal |
| Duel Commander | Legal |
| Gladiator | Legal |
| Highlander | Legal |
| Historic | Legal |
| Legacy | Legal |
| Leviathan | Legal |
| Limited | Legal |
| Modern | Legal |
| Oathbreaker | Legal |
| Pauper | Legal |
| Pauper EDH | Legal |
| Pioneer | Legal |
| Planechase | Legal |
| Pre-release | Legal |
| Quest Magic | Legal |
| Standard | Legal |
| Tiny Leaders | Legal |
| Vanguard | Legal |
| Vintage | Legal |
Planar Disruption
Enchantment — Aura
Enchant artifact, creature or planeswalker
Enchanted permanent can't attack or block, and its activated abilities can't be activated.
nuperokaso on
Orzhov Sacrifice Clerics
10 months ago
- Citizen's Arrest and Temporary Lockdown. Replace with Hero's Downfall, Planar Disruption, Oblivion Ring, Vindicate etc.
- Clawing Torment. I see no synergy with your deck. Use Tragic Slip or Fatal Push instead.
- Static Net Unless you plan to use the powerstone for something, Prayer of Binding is better since it has flash. But even that is not a good card.
- Sunfall Since your deck is a "sacrifice" deck, you most likely don't want to exile your creatures. If you really want a "Wrath" effect, probably play By Invitation Only. It works well if you have more creature than opponent.
- Sword of Once and Future You'll likely have nothing to cast with this.
- Orim's Chant While an unexpected trick, it effectively costs a card without affecting the board. I would simply play a 2 mana removal instead of this. If you really are a sacrifice deck, play Malicious Affliction.
legendofa on
Modern Benevolence
1 year ago
You can use Planar Disruption to prevent your opponent's artifacts from using their activated abilities. Often, though, artifacts will have triggered or static abilities, or paths can be found around the Disruption. A common one right now is using Sigarda's Aid to equip Colossus Hammer without paying its full equip cost. With PEnding, the permanent is gone, unless your opponent is going very off-meta with Riftsweeper or Pull from Eternity. (I personally think these cards are underrated, especially Pull in a graveyard deck.)
Dani3377 on
Modern Benevolence
1 year ago
Can't you use Planar Disruption to enchant your opponent's artifacts though? It says so right on the card. Also creatures and planeswalkers. I guess Non-land Permenant, (Prismatic Ending) technically means that it hits encahntments AS WELL as artifacts, planeswalkers and creatures.
I guess Declaration in Stone is wholly creatures and probably should be seen as a completely different kind of card.
legendofa on
Modern Benevolence
1 year ago
Dani3377 If I may answer, Prismatic Ending can exile much more than creatures; it can hit any nonland permanent (creature, artifact, enchantment, planeswalker), so it has a broader range than even Planar Disruption, while Declaration in Stone only affects creatures and gives the opponent a small reward. Also, Modern is very multicolor friendly, so the decks that will be running PEnding will be running 4-5 colors anyway. Third, most competitive threats in Modern will have a mana value of 2-3, sometimes 4, so PEnding has good reach on top of its good type coverage. Finally, and this point is very meta-dependent, I'm not sure PEnding is that ubiquitous, definitely less so than Lightning Bolt, for example. You might be seeing a higher than average rate, but at
https://www.mtggoldfish.com/metagame/modern#paper
only three of the top twelve decks run any number of PEnding, both of them are 4+ colors, and in these lists at least, two decks run two copies and the other runs three copies, so they're not using full playsets.
So there are a few reasons why Prismatic Ending is preferred over Planar Disruption or Declaration in Stone.
Icbrgr on
Modern Benevolence
1 year ago
@Dani3377 I think Declaration in Stone is more of a sideboard card if anything and in order to justify Planar Disruption in Modern you would need some sort of "enchantments matter" theme to your decks gameplan. Make no mistake I dont think either of these are bad cards though.
From the hip the reasons I see why Prismatic Ending is preferred over Planar Disruption is it has a wider range of targets; Ending is PERMANANT universal extra removal. 3 CMC/MV can hit a lot of relevant targets it can hit Chalice of the Void, can hit Amulet of Vigor, can hit Wrenn and Six/Tarmogoyf can hit Teferi, Time Raveler/Heliod, Sun-Crowned ect. ect. and not everything in these mana value slots need to attack or be activated... vs Planar Disruption something the opponent can get back if they have enchantment removal and hits less things... kinda like pro and con to Leyline Binding very easy to essentially have instant speed removal for almost everything but if the opponent has enchantment removal then it can just feel bad if you really needed it gone... not a perfect card but objectively a Modern staple even pushing out Path to Exile to being a sideboard card for many decks because of its versatility.
Dani3377 on
Modern Benevolence
1 year ago
why isnt Planar Disruption a card that gets used very much? How is Prismatic Ending so ubiquitous? ... Costs 3 mana to exile a creature of 3 mana cost or lower? What about Declaration in Stone. Still sorcery speed but there's no "kill the Planar Disruption and get my creature back mechanic.
Moreover Planar Disruption hits planeswalkers.
