One of the co-hosts of the Mages of Magic Podcast, along with my friends JundWolf (who originally got me on Tapped Out years ago) and Cobra_Chaos.


I first started playing MtG in 2013 via janky kitchen-table "Modern" with my college friends. We dove into EDH around 2019 & haven't looked back since.I aim for Brackets 2-4. When it makes sense to, I usually include at least 1 combo wincon to help close grindy games.

& have grown on me the most since I started playing MtG. Generally speaking, I'm a F.I.L.M enthusiast (F**k, I Love Mardu). I tend to refine my IRL decks more than brew new ones.

I've been playing disc golf and building/painting Gunpla more than brewing decks as of late 2025.


Decks currently owned/played in paper:


I won't be as active here as of summer 2026. You can also find me on Moxfield or Archidekt if you're interested. Take care.

legendofa says... #1

Sounds good, thanks! I'll check out Moxfield and see how it feels next to Archidekt, like you said, explore a little bit, see what I like.

September 15, 2026 11:25 p.m.

Crow_Umbra says... #2

Hey there legendofa, wishing you the best on your future migration.

Of the two sites, I've used Moxfield a lot more, & updated decks on Archidekt far more infrequently. Both sites have commenting options for public/unlisted decks. It looks like Archidekt has a forum section that is focused on specific deck help requests. I haven't really checked it out.

Although Moxfield doesn't have a forum aspect to it, I find its UI to be a bit more intuitive & clean compared to Archidekt.

Both sites have various bells & whistles for deck edits & tags, visual sorting, as well as a play testing feature. Archidekt's play-tester has a few more features to it, including a recently rolled out "Interaction simulator".

All in all, I think both sites are worth checking out. I don't find one to be "superior" to the other, I think it boils down to UI preferences for me. I'd recommend trying both out & seeing which you ultimately vibe with more.

September 15, 2026 8:50 p.m.

legendofa says... #3

I just kind of archived a bunch of decks on Archidekt. I'm not planning on moving there full time yet, but does it have the any kind of forum setup or deck commenting system? Any good tips or tricks for the site? How about Moxfield?

September 15, 2026 5:53 p.m. Edited.

Vessiliana says... #4

Thank you for the interest in my Sir William and Khalabaxin deck! <3

September 4, 2026 5:51 a.m.

Please login to comment

Said on How Could WotC …...

#1

If anything, Rulebreakers should be renamed to Rulebenders.

September 28, 2026 3:59 p.m.

Said on How Could WotC …...

#2

The Rulebreaker cards are all fairly fun and interesting designs. As an overall group, the Mystery Booster Commamder designs are of my favorites of the year.

Although Rulebreakers live up to their keyword, each of them still has to abide by some limitations. None of their broken rules are game-breaking or over powered. Most of commanders that allow for branching out into additional colors are often limited by:

  • Only being able to use basic lands of other colors, cutting off optimization options like Shocks and other duals/tri-lands.

  • The color branch out is often limited to one or two other spell types.

I think Rulebreaker would be fun to see more of in the right contexts. The ways in which they break the rules are limited in a manner that encourages creativity.

September 27, 2026 6:19 p.m.

Said on Crow_Umbra...

#3

Hey there legendofa, wishing you the best on your future migration.

Of the two sites, I've used Moxfield a lot more, & updated decks on Archidekt far more infrequently. Both sites have commenting options for public/unlisted decks. It looks like Archidekt has a forum section that is focused on specific deck help requests. I haven't really checked it out.

Although Moxfield doesn't have a forum aspect to it, I find its UI to be a bit more intuitive & clean compared to Archidekt.

Both sites have various bells & whistles for deck edits & tags, visual sorting, as well as a play testing feature. Archidekt's play-tester has a few more features to it, including a recently rolled out "Interaction simulator".

All in all, I think both sites are worth checking out. I don't find one to be "superior" to the other, I think it boils down to UI preferences for me. I'd recommend trying both out & seeing which you ultimately vibe with more.

September 15, 2026 8:50 p.m.

Specialties

Commander / EDH - Primer, Commander / EDH - RBW (Mardu)

MTG Decks

The Surgin' General [Primer]

Commander / EDH* Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 72 | 11 COMMENTS | 7147 VIEWS | IN 18 FOLDERS

Musashi's Mosh Pit [Primer]

Commander / EDH* Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 350 | 162 COMMENTS | 49950 VIEWS | IN 138 FOLDERS

Maddening Mantra [Primer]

Commander / EDH Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 15 | 1 COMMENT | 562 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER

Triple Six, Five, Forked Tongue [Primer]

Commander / EDH* Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 145 | 68 COMMENTS | 20828 VIEWS | IN 55 FOLDERS

Bre'silian Skies [Primer]

Commander / EDH Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 52 | 11 COMMENTS | 4162 VIEWS | IN 12 FOLDERS

Terror Forming Terraforming [Primer]

Commander / EDH Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 51 | 19 COMMENTS | 4896 VIEWS | IN 10 FOLDERS

Watch the Party Die [Primer]

Commander / EDH Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 76 | 26 COMMENTS | 8290 VIEWS | IN 20 FOLDERS

Neon Light Speed [Primer]

Commander / EDH Crow_Umbra

SCORE: 109 | 24 COMMENTS | 11141 VIEWS | IN 51 FOLDERS

Finished Decks 102
Prototype Decks 42
Drafts 0
Playing since Dragon's Maze
Points 417
Avg. deck rating 36.02
T/O Rank 15
Helper Rank 28
Favorite formats Commander / EDH
Suppressed formats Standard, Alchemy, Standard Brawl, Historic, Pioneer, Modern, Pauper, Legacy, Vintage, Pauper EDH, Gladiator, Highlander, Duel Commander, Pauper Duel Commander, Leviathan, 1v1 Commander, Premodern, Oldschool 93/94, Limited, Pre-release, Planechase, Archenemy, Vanguard, Tiny Leaders, Oathbreaker, Block Constructed, Arena, Casual, Unformat, Quest Magic
Cards suggested / good suggestions 1161 / 561
Cards Added/Fixed 235
Joined 13 years