Caerwyn Esquire

• Edit User
• Edit Profile
• Enable styles
• Disable styles
• Unblock user
• Block user
• Disable chat
• Enable chat
• Remove friend
• Add as friend
• Gift Tokens
• Settings

Scooby-Doo is a classic, appealing to both nostalgic parents and children, with each generation being able to take over from the prior, perpetuating the cycle. TMNT and Transformers were backed by strong and continuing merchandising--new releases allow their merchandising juggernauts to continue their domination.

The other examples have nostalgia value to those who watched them, but that's about it. They don't currently move toys, and they were never so generational as to develop a 51-year-long fanbase.

To actually answer the timing question, the counters are all put on simultaneously. You are free to put said counters on one singular creature or spread across multiple creatures. Again, none of this will trigger Willbreaker, but figured I should answer the timing and choice questions as well.

Card Ruling:

You may choose a different creature to put each counter on, but you can also choose the same creature multiple times. The creatures don’t have to be controlled by the same opponent.

These cards do not interact with one another. Sheltering Ancient's Cumulative Upkeep ability does not target, thus does not trigger Willbreaker.

I think a Four Horsemen themed one could be kind of fun.

Conqueror's Flail (moderately priced card. Not many options for this Horsemen - there’s a Three Kingdoms card that’s more valuable, but not necessarily deserving of a reprint).

Ravages of War (expensive, useful card).

Sword of Feast and Famine (expensive, useful card).

Death's Shadow (moderately priced, useful card).

Edit: The Eschatological Horsemen, not the Magic deck of the same name, as should be clear.

The permission to post images and links needs to be manually enabled for each account - I have gone ahead and done so for you. As for the actual code to get a background to work, that’s not something I know—sorry!

I didn’t want to post on a thread that’s been inactive for a while, but I did want to point out Serra's Sanctum is legal in Commander. Tolarian Academy is the only one of that cycle banned. This is because decks are already going to run mana rocks, so every single deck with Blue would run Academy—enchantment-heavy decks are rare, and wide creature decks are harder to field early than a host potentially explosive first turn of mana rocks.

Gaea's Cradle also serves an important, non-ramp function in the game - it allows creature-heavy decks to deal with The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale.

Ah, I was remembering Sheoldred's text wrong. That makes the comparison a bit less accurate, but I think a CMC of 7 is still the sweet spot.

From an aesthetic point, I do not like how looks - the more hybrid symbols you chain in a row, the messier the mana cost appears to be. Three seems fine, four is fine when it's just those symbols (Deathless Knight), but once you add a generic symbol as well, I think it feels a bit cluttered.

That said, as a mechanics concept, I think that might be the better mana cost to use. You could also make it require two White and to Black mana, which looks a bit better and is more restrictive.

The best point of comparison would probably be Sheoldred, Whispering One. I'd say Sheoldred is the better card--Flying is arguably better than Swampwalk (but not by too much, considering how easy it is to make lands Swamps), but the sacrifice effect easily makes Sheoldred the superior option.

You could probably reduce the cost of this to . Yes, it means you get a body on Debtors' Knell for the same cost, but that's not always better--bodies are easier to remove. That would put this angel at the same CMC as Sheoldred, albeit with slightly different mana requirements (at seven mana, meeting those requirements is easier anyway).

Now, the one thing where this excels over Sheoldred is the ability to run multiples of it. Buried Alive fetching three of these, followed by Reanimate on one would be a pretty strong value engine as the turns progress. That's a scary prospect, but it isn't any more degenerate than any of the other horrific things you can do with reanimation.

Honestly, I'd avoid making a Calvin and Hobbes pairing--we already sort of have one of those in Pir and Toothy.

That said, I would probably go with Blue for Hobbes, perhaps with a Green activated ability. One of Hobbes' underlying character traits is his intellectualism (at least in his and Calvin's mind), and it is frequently shown that he doesn't actually know how to be a wild tiger. However, he does have moments of primal savagery he seems to have little control over (by way of example, the numerous comics where Calvin opens the door when he gets home from school).

Question 1: Does Ashiok, Nightmare Museultimate allowed me to cast cards that were imprinted?

Yes. Ashiok allows you to cast any face-up exiled cards, and Imprint exiles cards face up.

Question 2/3: Can I continue to activate abilities of the cards with Imprint?

Nope. Abilities related to imprint refer to the specific cards exiled by the imprint ability. Once that card is no longer exiled (for example, you cast it, moving it to the stack), the imprint card can no longer find that specific exiled card, and thus cannot do anything related to "the exiled card".

I don’t have anything to contribute to the cards themselves, but I did want to cite the 1986 Valentine’s Day comic.

This thread was moved to a more appropriate forum (auto-generated comment)

This thread was moved to a more appropriate forum (auto-generated comment)

My biggest problem with this card is the idea of 1/1s with trample. That's pretty much the same as a vanilla 1/1, even if it does get a bit better when you can pump the creature.

Maybe Hexproof, Vigilance, or Reach? They might not be as fundamentally Green as Trample, but all three are found on assorted Elementals and work a bit better on a 1/1.

No tracking involved - just basic common sense. I can also say that I've never muted you before you posted--though, sometimes you are kind enough to make an incriminating first post, allowing me to get you pretty easily.

I'll answer the question you posted on yeaGO's page.

You were asked long ago to leave this site due to your incessant trolling and your constant making of new accounts to circumvent mutes. This has been going on for well over a year--you troll, you get muted, you make a new account, repeat ad infinitum. I have tried to be polite about it, using long posts explaining what you did wrong and how you could do better next time. I have tried the silent treatment, simply taking necessary action and moving on with my day. Let me try being overt--TappedOut is a great site with a wonderful, helpful community. You, with inability to maintain being anything other than a troll, do not belong here.

I will admit that you can, on occasion, provide good feedback in a constructive, helpful manner. Sometimes, you even manage to feign decent conversation for a couple days. In the past, I have tried to give you quarter, allowing you to continue posting long after I figured out who you were--each time, you ended up defaulting to your trollish ways in relatively short order.

Here is how it is going to be--once I figure out an account is you, it's going to get a mute, regardless of whether you are managing to behave yourself or not.

That leaves you with three choices.

1. Continue to post here as you always do, and continue to make new accounts to circumvent the inevitable mutes. Perhaps you get some obtuse pleasure from the status quo. For myself, it's hardly even a bother--a couple clicks and I don't have to give you any further thought for the immediate future.

2. You can be a helpful, productive member every time you post--perhaps then we might be fooled into thinking you are a different and respectable person.

3. Find a different site to troll. There are plenty of Magic sites out there, and some (perhaps Reddit) are probably more receptive to your abrasive personality.

Saw your post on one of your threads - the ability to post links and images is disabled for accounts by default and has to be manually enabled. I have gone ahead and done so for you, so everything should work now!

You’re only looking at the turn the land is played. Your gain for both the actual land and the example artifact is 0 for turn - the net gain is the ability to generate two.

Again, net gain, not turn gain. Your modification results in a turn gain of 0, but a net gain of 3 (one from land you played and tapped for the artifact, which is an additional two).

manbearpig90 - That wouldn't account for the fact that you still could have played a land drop for turn, and thus your net gain of mana for that turn is two. If it added two mana, your net gain for the turn would be 3, which wouldn't be half bad.

Sure, the analogy falls apart a little when you get to the later game; but illustrations are obviously only that--demonstrative thought experiments.

When evaluating utility lands, I like to think of them as artifacts that cost (seeing as you are giving up your land drop for the turn), then determining if I would run that artifact.

So, for Untaidake, we get:

Untaidake Artifact

~ comes into play tapped.

: Add . Spend this mana only to cast legendary spells.

The above is better than Untaidake actually is--the land you would tap to pay the artifacts' casting cost would still be unencumbered by restrictions or producing colorless mana.

Overall, I would say Untaidake fails the artifact test, and thus is not really worth running.