Nacatl War-Pride

Legality

Format Legality
Noble Legal
1v1 Commander Legal
Vintage Legal
Modern Legal
Casual Legal
Vanguard Legal
Legacy Legal
Archenemy Legal
Planechase Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Unformat Legal
Pauper Legal
Commander / EDH Legal

Printings View all

Set Rarity
Future Sight (FUT) Uncommon

Combos Browse all

Nacatl War-Pride

Creature — Cat Warrior

Nacatl War-Pride must be blocked by exactly one creature if able.

Whenever Nacatl War-Pride attacks, put X tokens that are copies of Nacatl War-Pride onto the battlefield tapped and attacking, where X is the number of creatures defending player controls. Exile the tokens at the beginning of the next end step.

Price & Acquistion Set Price Alerts

FUT

Ebay

Have (3) TheAlmostHero , sonnet666 , gildan_bladeborn
Want (0)

Recent Decks

Load more

Nacatl War-Pride Discussion

sagramore on Arahbo's Kitted-Out Kitties

1 day ago

psycocat - Thanks for the comments and glad you like the deck! I have most of those cards in my collection so I'll take a think about them. I was saving things like Nacatl War-Pride for use in a slightly different GW cat tokens deck using Mirri as the commander..... :)

psycocat on Arahbo's Kitted-Out Kitties

1 day ago

Wow. this is awesome. I don't have a lot of these cards, but I was hoping to find a deck like this to tweek my own cat deck. I have been collecting the cats for years.

Some suggestions if you haven't thought of them:

I look forward to playing with this list for my own deck.

Thanks

DarkSepho on Running Wild With Scissors

1 day ago

btw Nacatl War-Pride copies from Blade of Selves won't trigger because they aren't declared attacking

Matrixxx999 on Rhonas the Indomitable: Larger than Life

1 week ago

Hi, BolasFucks!

Thanks for upvote and for kind words! No I haven't consider Traverse the Ulvenwald! Thanks for suggestion.

Ok, miracleHat, Thanks for your comment and your suggestions. I will try to answer your questions and clarify my choice of certain cards.

Playgroup - Most often I play against Zur, Purphoros, Xenagos. Sometime I play against Meren, Azusa, Rafiq, Narset etc. So, I cant say that I create decks for some specific environment. On the contrary, I try to make decks as more versatile as posible.

Question about Pathbreaker Ibex and Wild Beastmaster: I realy doubt that someday I will cut Pathbreaker Ibex, its to good in this deck, it is one of the main agro creatures of the deck, it has a lot of strong synergies with so many cards (described in primer) and with Rhonas. When my opponents see him on the battlefield, they begin to fidget nervously in the armchairs and ask each other "Do You have board wipe spell?". You yourself mentioned that redundancy is very important in EDH and I absolutely agree with this. Wild Beastmaster is in the testing mode, was added to the deck about a week ago and havent been tested well enough, but I agree that it could be replaced with something more useful. I will consider some replacemets after more testing.

About winmore cards: Traverse the Outlands - "If you are spending 5 mana to find 8 lands, chances you are already winning on that turn or going to assuredly win on the upcoming turn" - exactly! You will just win on the next turn, and it can happen on turn four easily. Comparing Mana Reflection with Traverse the Outlands I can say that in this deck Traverse the Outlands is better, because its cheaper, provides more safe ramp (dont need to survive a turn) and as You said both of them are winmore. And I prefer to use as a mana doubler Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger, tutorable, can be cheated and has a mana denial ability. Nacatl War-Pride is in the testing mode too, recently added, but I see a lot of potencial in this creature! The reasons why it is a good card in this deck described in Primer. Exploration - this deck dosen't draw lands, and the land count is minimal so most of the game Exploration is useless, I tested it a lot. For the same reason I cut Azusa from the deck. Staff of Domination is good for redundency for combos, but It will be a second card wich is useless outside of combo and I don't want it, thats why I run only Mantle in the deck. Win through a combo is plan B in this deck, usualy it wins through agro strategy. Choosing from the Eldrazi titans I would choose only one - Ulamog, the Ceaseless Hunger, he is in Maybeboard for a long time and someday I will try to use him, maybe instead of World Breaker. This deck run very powerful spells for drawing extra cards (especialy with Rhonas early in the game) i like those spells more then Kozilek.

I am familiar with Recycle and it is definitely an interesting card, I will think about using it, in this deck it could be realy fun

So hope I clarified the choice of cards and why they are good/or bad in this deck. If you have any additional questions or suggestions, be sure to ask.

miracleHat on Rhonas the Indomitable: Larger than Life

1 week ago

Me is curious, what decks does your meta/playgroup consist of?

Either way, you should highly consider removing Pathbreaker Ibex and Wild Beastmaster. While both quite easily pump up your team, they pale in comparison to Craterhoof Behemoth. While redundancy is always a good thing to have in an edh deck, neither are strong enough by themselves (i.e. they do not win the game immediately) to warrant inclusion to a "control" deck. Recycle and Praetor's Counsel will do you better.

In this deck, there are plenty of winmore cards. Traverse the Outlands, Viridian Longbow, and Nacatl War-Pride all fit into the category. If you are spending 5 mana to find 8 lands, chances are you are already winning on that turn or going to assuredly win on the upcoming turn. Consider using cards such as Exploration (explosive), Mana Reflection (this on turn 3, if it survives, usually means you win on turn 5), Staff of Domination (combos). You should also find space for the eldrazi titans (kozilek especially as more potent card draw).

There are cards in this deck that don't make sense (some mentioned above), unless you are tuning your deck against specific other decks (i.e. not tfc / pfc / U/x stax)

shaistyone on Combo vs. Synergy

2 weeks ago

It really is a scale. And the line is pretty personal over what is a combo (which I personally view as the top tier of synergistic effects). Sometimes it is obvious to me, like Exquisite Blood / Sanguine Bond is a combo, theft effects and Conjurer's Closet is synergy.
But there are cases where the line gets blurry, a la Teferi's Puzzle Box / Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar (which put the game drastically out of reach) or Nacatl War-Pride / Cathars' Crusade (which won the game immediately).
In your case, I wouldn't call that combination a combo. It seems to be more of a thought exercise to see how much mana you could generate, as you probably would have been fine doing anything you needed with two of them.

roxie3534 on Gruul Token

1 month ago

There is one card in this deck that makes tokens? What if the opponent has no creatures, or you don't draw the Nacatl War-Pride?

Load more