|Commander / EDH||Legal|
Printings View all
|Modern Masters 2015 Edition (MM2)||Uncommon|
|Duel Decks: Jace vs. Vraska (DDM)||Uncommon|
|Ravnica: City of Guilds (RAV)||Uncommon|
|Promo Set (000)||Uncommon|
Combos Browse all
Counter target spell. If that spell is countered this way, put it into its owner's hand instead of into that player's graveyard.
Draw a card.
|Have (8)||Skulldrey , Mortiferus_Rosa , , metalmagic , CampbellStev , MrShhh , , Forkbeard|
|Want (10)||0310788 , stupidgaypanda , yesacs , Orpheus124 , JararoNatsu , Eitahl , Raediaent , Tugboat , nClark45 , 801Hellfire|
1 day ago
Perhaps asking if there are any responses to the stack as presented would work better. If no one has any, you could then say, "Okay, after the copies resolve but before the original does, I cast Remand ," and continue from there.
Asking if "they resolve" or "the copies resolve" might imply letting the whole stack pass, which is where it's ambiguous.
1 day ago
Situation: I cast Gigadrowse and replicate it x times to tap my opponent's x permanents (the main spell and one of the copies are both targeting the same one of their permanents). I plan to Remand the main Gigadrowse back to my hand once the rest of the copies have resolved, but I also want to keep it available while the copies resolve in case my opponent tries something. I don't want to manually go through the stack asking if each individual Gigadrowse copy resolves until the physical card, so I want to just say something like "Do they resolve?" and then if my opponent says yes, I'd Remand my Gigadrowse after all the copies have resolved. Am I allowed to do this, or does my saying "Do they resolve?" automatically imply that I am not going to cast any more spells? Thanks.
2 days ago
2 days ago
The Gut Shot and Winterflame are better off as 2 Electrolyze
2 days ago
I miss some cards in your list and am curious about your decisions to exclude them.
There are some inclusions I'm not very fond of:
Could you tell me your reasons for including the later cards in comparism to the earlier mentioned cards?
3 days ago
replace jace with Laboratory Maniac , it synergizes more with uncage.
i would also swap out leafcaller for more card filtering to get to your combo faster, or to add a different wincon in case your plan A goes awry.
6 days ago
so many anti synergies in this deck, in most games Deprive is just going to be a worse Mana Leak or Remand as both those options can allow you to cast a baral turn 3 and protect him (currently you may even just want one or two of the Negate in your mb for this same reason), for all of your current mb counters the earliest you could do this is turn 4 (provided your 20 land deck makes it to 4 lands without hoping to trade a creature for a path).
6 days ago
I would look at Plow Under and Jace, the Mind Sculptor if you can afford that guy. Plow is just highly underrated, not only does it remove 2 lands from the game but denies them the next 2 draws without manipulation (shuffle, scry, or draw). The issule you'll find with a strat like this is that once you run out of copies of Eye of Nowhere , Boomerang , Plow Under if you don't have something threatening in play you will die. at the local shop back in 8th standard we told each other if you get plow'd twice, you lose but that was a long time ago and in a different format. Remand would be great here with the LD package. Almost like a Time Walk because they would tap out for nothing and you draw a card. Things like this is why I would like to see Jace here. his -1 ability bounces the threats you miss while staying on the field, lets you dig, fate seal away their lands or playable spells. He's just solid. You could also look at Tamiyo, the Moon Sage as a U version of Ajani Vengeant that once you hit ultimate lets you have unlimited counters like we did in standard with any counter that exiles but theres always Crackling Drake .
Remand occurrence in decks from the last year
All decks: 0.46%
Commander / EDH:
All decks: 0.02%