|Commander / EDH||Legal|
Printings View all
|Commander 2017 (C17)||Rare|
|MTG: Commander (CMD)||Rare|
|Planar Chaos (PLC)||Rare|
Combos Browse all
Teneb, the Harvester
Legendary Creature — Dragon
Whenever Teneb, the Harvester deals combat damage to a player, you may pay . If you do, put target creature card in a graveyard into play under your control.
Price & Acquistion Set Price Alerts
|Have (17)||Caldazar , Wolfebladeelite , sonnet666 , bakeraj4 , johnsongrantr , BlueMageBrandon , geazykagar , pskinn01 , TheAlmostHero , angesoir , miracle , innokenty , saj0219 , MattN7498 , rockleemyhero , golgarigirl , DarkMagician|
Teneb, the Harvester Discussion
3 days ago
So I see 102 cards. One of them is an extra fumigate and you'll have to drop something else...
Three reanimation effects with a commander that fills your grave? I'd add a few more: Bladewing the Risen, Journey to Eternity Flip, Reanimate, Cauldron Dance, Debtors' Knell, Teneb, the Harvester are all pretty good. Living Death or Patriarch's Bidding are game enders. 5 mana + 2 more for each dragon you want to reanimate... I don't know if it gets much scarier.
The Ur-Dragon- I'd put this in the 99. I think scion makes for a better commander since he is faster and grabs any dragon for you but Ur is a ton of value to go and put in your grave off scion's ability then hit with Reanimate next turn XD
Bower Passage- I find this hilarious, now dragons are unblockable.
There are so many cool dragons I don't know what else to recommend... Just experiment.
Some considerations for removal: Coat of Arms, Darksteel Forge, Slumbering Dragon. I realize you are already looking to remove 2 of those but in case you were unsure about them they really don't belong here. Slumbering is a nice early dragon but I'd rather be ramping into better dragons. I'm always terrible at removals so I really don't know what else to take out...
5 days ago
Although Teneb, the Harvester does look like a great way to recur dragons from the scion and keep the game running when I am out of creatures to cast.
I am not sold on Ryusei, the Falling Star either
I am keeping in all the regents for flavor
5 days ago
1 week ago
I agree that I need to have more targeted removal in order to protect my board although I'm not sure if i'm too into adding cards to cheat dragons into play.
I am going to keep all the dragon lords in for flavor although I would argue that Dragonlord Kolaghan is a haste enabler which is very important, Dragonlord Ojutai is card draw and Dragonlord Atarka is sort of targeted removal which isnt bad at all.
However I do need to remove things to add in more protection, what are your opinions on Spellbound Dragon, Painful Truths, Boneyard Scourge, O-Kagachi, Vengeful Kami and the Teneb, the Harvester, Intet, the Dreamer and Crosis, the Purger trio
2 months ago
Another way to look at control that most would accept as more "fun" involves boardwipes and removal.
I say this as a Talrand player of the opinion that multiplayer gets harder and harder to control with counterspells (albeit lots of fun if you can bluff the table into taking each turn into council as you entertain opinions about what should and should not be countered).
The more fun control could look like Teneb, the Harvester filling up graveyards and picking through them later. For some reason most people would call this "fun".
The next problem comes along when everyone plays graveyard shenanigans because it's "socially considered fun" and all of a sudden it matters where you are seated round the table for sorting out who gets to respond to a creature entering the graveyard first.
I actually prefer running my Talrand because I hate repetitiveness to the point where seating matters ... geez. But you used that little word "fun" which can be so loaded in EDH sometimes - although it may not be laced with aesthetic dogmatism in this particular case. It's hard to tell from one short paragraph.
2 months ago
3 months ago
Not sure if this is the right place for this, but for some reason certain cards references in my description of my deck (Farming: the Gathering) no longer show the custom name I gave them, but rather just show the card name. I'm using the same syntax for all of them ("card:card name|word" inside double brackets), yet only some show up right.
What am I doing wrong here? Thanks!