Comments View Archive
i think if u want to cut things you could remove the pillar of flames and the lavamancers if u wanted, the deck doesn't exactly need them imo.
March 28, 2016 2:43 a.m.
also reckless bushwhacker is amazing in this kind of deck.
March 28, 2016 2:45 a.m.
rainbowofdeath ~ pillar is absolutely a flex-slot, but lavamancer is something that i've tested, and trust me, he can be a force to be reckoned with against other aggro decks, and he's even a decent way to follow up that turn 4 boardwipe against control.
didn't even know about bushwhacker. I like the synergy with Burning-Tree Emissary, but aside from that, im sure i can justify 3 for 2. I'll test it though, maybe my bolts and rancors are are enough to trigger it consistently.
March 28, 2016 3 a.m.
March 28, 2016 2:02 p.m.
March 28, 2016 2:05 p.m.
March 28, 2016 2:06 p.m.
March 28, 2016 2:11 p.m.
Reckless Bushwhacker is a HOUSE for this deck. I've been playing a non budget version of this deck and he's the best card in the deck against non-aggro decks. My favorite flood protection card in a deck like this is a singleton Devastating Summons as well. Both are cheap and super explosive cards you could fit into this type of deck.
April 1, 2016 8:21 p.m.
Long time Gruul player here (since 2004) and I stand by the Grim Lavamancers. They are both board control versus aggro and reach versus control.
I really liked this series. My only suggestion is that a cheap (extra $10 maybe) sideboard would be great. I know SB depends on meta, but the suggestions could be made for an open field.
April 1, 2016 10:27 p.m.
did A LOT of testing between cards to try and fit bushwacker. him over Flinthoof Boar is an immense improvement in most scenarios. just an excellent way to finish a game
April 2, 2016 12:22 p.m.
April 2, 2016 1:29 p.m.
-FugitaZ- the point of this deck is to be budget, so to replace 10 cent lands with lands that are $5 is kinda against the point.
April 2, 2016 7:24 p.m.
There's that, but I'm also not sure I'm comfortable suggesting lands that I have never tested in modern.
The purpose of this series is to introduce newer players to modern archetypes. So I would never give a suggestion for a card I personally would not play. And I'm just not sold on that cycle for modern yet.
April 2, 2016 10:41 p.m.
Please login to comment
|Date added||1 year|
|Last updated||1 year|
This deck is Modern legal.
|Folders||Inspiration, Guess who's back, Interesting Decks, Cheap Modern, Budget Ideas, Intro Series Modern, Favorites, Potential Builds, Modern Ideas, Modern maybe, See all 11|
|Top rank||#17 on 2016-04-10|