Looking for a deck
Modern Deck Help forum
Posted on Aug. 21, 2016, 6:34 a.m. by SuneEnough
So I've been looking for a good sliver modern deck but I haven't found much. Does anyone know one? If you do, can you post the decklist? Thanks.
Shane.Allen says... #3
4 Galerider Sliver 1 Darkheart Sliver
3 Diffusion Sliver 4 Manaweft Sliver
4 Predatory Sliver
2 Sentinel Sliver
4 Sinew Sliver
2 Blur Sliver
2 Necrotic Sliver 3 Sedge Sliver
1 Syphon Sliver
Spells (10)
4 AEther Vial 2 Abrupt Decay
4 Collected Company
Lands (20)
1 Blood Crypt 1 Breeding Pool
4 Cavern of Souls
1 Forest 4 Mutavault
2 Overgrown Tomb
4 Sliver Hive
2 Windswept Heath1 Wooded Foothills
Sideboard (15)
2 Abrupt Decay1 Darkheart Sliver
3 Harmonic Sliver 1 Shadow Sliver
2 Syphon Sliver 2 Bonescythe Sliver
2 Telekinetic Sliver2 Sliver Hivelord
August 21, 2016 6:53 a.m. Edited.
Guys again, i said this yesterday, if we're going to post lists can we post them as actual decks. Walls of card text are not particularly forum friendly.
Also of someone asks for a good list and you provide one it helps to say where that list came from abd what makes it good.
And if were posting links can we make sure theyre formatted appropriately.
All of this information is available from the formatting tips
August 21, 2016 8:28 a.m. Edited.
Shane.Allen says... #6
its a modern sliver deck, complete and ready to play. he can change it use it do whatever he wants with it, its what he asked for. a thank you would be nice.
August 21, 2016 8:52 a.m.
No its not what was asked. OP explicitly asked for "good" modern slivers and said he or she couldnt find any. We can assume that OP can use tappedout and google but isnt satisfied with the run of the mill generic lists that come up from these sources. It is clear OP is asking for a deeper level of analysis and something a bit more special.
When someone asks for a good list it is necessary to explain why what you have provided is a good list. What this usually means is, as I explained, a link to an external website showcasing a tournament winner because that provides a deck with evidence to back its credentials.
You are also ignoring me about listing decks in forums which isnt wise because I spend a lot of time clearing up the modern forum.
Input is obviously appreciated but there are ways to go about doing this. I am trying to steer you in the right direction.
August 21, 2016 9:02 a.m.
And there are ways of doing that that dont involve lists of cards in forum posts. It's just a tappedout thing. This is the way things are done. Ive asked nicely multiple times now. Please avoid where possible.
August 21, 2016 9:58 a.m.
ducttapedeckbox says... #10
It's also increasingly important to cite a source when referring to an off-meta deck due to its lesser popularity and competitiveness.
August 21, 2016 11:09 a.m.
SuneEnough says... #11
ChiefBell I understand your confusion towards my gender, people have assumed I am female before, but I am male.
August 21, 2016 1:40 p.m.
i use gender neutral language where feasible and when i remember.
im not confused.
August 21, 2016 3:22 p.m. Edited.
I was goolging around and came across this post on r/magicTCG. I think it has some interesting things to say and some links to decks as well. Check it out.
MollyMab says... #2
http://www.mtgdecks.net/deck/starcitygames_com_modern_open_indianapolis_in/modern/slivers_adam_bowman/619754/
August 21, 2016 6:50 a.m.