Beg me for Life...

Pauper DRACULA150704

SCORE: 20 | 20 COMMENTS | 2625 VIEWS | IN 10 FOLDERS


T1Glistener says... #1

24 lands and 16 creatures is way too many for infect. Ideally you would have 12 infecters, 20 lands, and the rest pump. The Llanowar Augur could be replaced with Giant Growth and take out 4 Forest for Rancor.

September 1, 2017 6:45 a.m.

Ghosty says... #2

I'd say it's still too many lands if you have max CMC

September 6, 2017 5:15 a.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #3

Yeah probably, say if you know any good buffs I'm missing

September 7, 2017 4:45 a.m.

Recover819 says... #4

Apostle's Blessing in the main deck. Not only protects you from interactive spells but if you run across a bad combat trade.

October 11, 2017 9:06 a.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #5

what should i take out then?

October 11, 2017 6:48 p.m.

I don't know how much removal is played in pauper, but I think that Vines of Vastwood is much better than Seal of Strength for the main board.

Is Gitaxian Probe banned in pauper? If not play it as well. Information is so important with infect. Probably cut 2 Forest and 2 giant growth.

October 12, 2017 10:37 a.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #7

ok, but if i put Vines of Vastwood in I am not taking out Seal of Strength because apart from Glistener Elf it is my best turn 1 play as you can use its ability whenever. Also Gitaxian Probe is not banned so i might put it in. Thanks

October 12, 2017 6:24 p.m.

darkmatter32x says... #8

May consider Briar Shield.

October 13, 2017 10:50 p.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #9

I used to have it in the deck and it is good, but there are better things. also it cant be a turn 1 play like Seal of Strength because you need the creature.

October 13, 2017 11:08 p.m.

Podkomorka says... #10

Immediately take out Naturalize for Nature's Claim

October 14, 2017 4:05 p.m.

darkmatter32x says... #11

Invigorate is banned in pauper.

October 20, 2017 2:02 a.m.

Darkshadow327 says... #12

I don't even know what to say.

A: I don't play pauper

B: Infect and I have a love-hate relationship (and I'm not really familiar with infect anymore).

Seems solid for a pauper infect deck though.

October 28, 2017 12:59 a.m.

too bad Invigorate is banned in pauper format

October 30, 2017 4:33 p.m.

x12721 says... #14

As majorappliance and darkmatter32x said, Invigorate is banned in Pauper.

November 8, 2017 8:09 a.m.

PickleNutz says... #15

Predator's Strike is a great card for infect based strategies. It is multi-purpose too. It can evade burn spells, adding defense to your creature, because it is an instant. It can also allow your creature to get through blockers with Trample.

I also like Blossoming Defense a bit more than Vines of Vastwood because it doesnt cost extra for the buff. Its really preference though.

November 8, 2017 3:47 p.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #16

PickleNutz, I would love to put Blossoming Defense into my deck but unfortunately it isn't legal in pauper because it is uncommon.

November 9, 2017 5:36 p.m.

PickleNutz says... #17

Oh yeah, stupid pauper rules. Haha, well... you could always grab a black marker and pretend... claim it was reprinted. Right?

November 9, 2017 6:17 p.m.

Exbeen34 says... #18

Invigorate is banned.

November 11, 2017 10:33 a.m.

Just so you know, Invigorate is banned in pauper, contrary to what tappedout seems to think.

November 14, 2017 5:03 p.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #20

Just letting you know before you comment that I know that Invigorate is banned but the people that I play with allow it.

November 14, 2017 11:42 p.m.

"Since Pauper is a Magic Online specific format, it does not extend to physical cards. Therefore the term Paper Pauper is used to distinguish it from its MTGO counterpart.Paper Pauper has also no official banlist"
-mtg.gamepedia

November 16, 2017 9:07 a.m.

gdm1989 says... #22

thought about using Necropede?

November 18, 2017 12:09 a.m.

DRACULA150704 says... #23

gdm1989, no I haven't since it is banned.

November 18, 2017 1:30 a.m.

Please login to comment