Budget Izzet Delver

Standard* ak3036

SCORE: 13 | 27 COMMENTS | 5518 VIEWS | IN 4 FOLDERS


Game Day —Oct. 27, 2012

Came 4th in Game Day changed around some cards so that the deck runs more smoothly against Reactive Control and Selesnya Populate

Me vs Selesnya Populate 2-0

Me vs Selesnya Aggro 2-1

Me vs Rakdos Aggro 2-0

Me vs Izzet Reactive Control 1-2

lDruid says... #1

I'd remove the Artful Dodge 's for the Thought Scour s, They work nicely with Index .

September 25, 2012 10:52 a.m.

ak3036 says... #2

I am trying to keep my deck anti-flashback and I need the extra evasion to get points of damage past

September 25, 2012 6:25 p.m.

ak3036 says... #3

and I don't know which cards (other than Artful Dodge ) that I should swap with thought scour

September 25, 2012 6:26 p.m.

hiroryusaki says... #4

Here, made you a sweeter version, its still cheap and casual, but will play much better: http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/budget-izzet/

September 26, 2012 6:59 p.m.

notan88 says... #5

I'm a sucker for Invisible Stalker with card:Runechanter's Pike. If you like him I would take out Augur of Bolas for him.

October 4, 2012 3:03 a.m.

zandl says... #6

Steam Vents > Izzet Guildgate . Also, add in Sulfur Falls . 4 of each.

Then add 2x Desolate Lighthouse .

Take out Think Twice for Izzet Charm , because Izzet Charm is stupid-good and Think Twice is too slow for Delver.

October 4, 2012 3:26 a.m.

ak3036 says... #7

@zandl If you read the description I am trying to keep this deck as budget as possible and Izzet Charm causes me to discard 2 cards

@notan88 I really like Augur of Bolas as it can help me draw Instants/Sorceries and has Toughness 3 which is a great blocker against Zombies

October 4, 2012 4:09 a.m.

ak3036 says... #8

@notan88 I am seeing that the metagame is highly removal so I am going to replace Augur of Bolas with Invisible Stalker

October 4, 2012 6:11 a.m.

jonhoffman46 says... #9

Desperate ravings instead of faithless looting? Fits your mana budget and is always a +1, unlike faithless looting

October 6, 2012 11:15 a.m.

shirtninja says... #10

I see what you're doing here, and I like it. You might want to consider Goblin Electromancer , as it'll make your instants and sorceries cheaper, and he's a bad creature, either.

October 6, 2012 11:19 a.m.

knapp42 says... #11

[Izzet Charm] is a power house in this deck, can shock, provide tempo and loot for cantrips for pike. I say at least 3-4 of

October 6, 2012 1:15 p.m.

Permafrost says... #12

I respect the fact that you are trying to keep this a budget deck, but you really do need the good duel lands dude. At least Sulfur Falls. Also your side board seems really bad. you should never need 4 crypts SB. You should add some artifact removal and maybe some different counter spells, like Dispel or Dissipate

October 6, 2012 5:30 p.m.

ak3036 says... #13

Thank you guys for the comments I will address them individually

@shirtninga I did originally have Goblin Electromancer in the deck however it was a little too slow and I didn't use it that much

@knapp42 Izzet Charm odes everything my cards do already however it does all of them worse. For Example I have Pillar of Flame to deal 2 damage and it also exiles for 1 less mana. I have Syncopate and Cyclonic Rift for counters and I have Desperate Ravings for the card drawing (it cost's 1 less mana and has flashback)

@Permafrost I have developed my sideboard in the metagame and I haven't seen much people playing artifacts and this deck has control in other aspects that is why it only has 1 counterspell. My sideboard is mainly against Zombies, Delver and Tokens which is really popular in my local metagame. I will add in Sulfur Falls as the time goes by

October 6, 2012 6:23 p.m.

Stein_ says... #14

Goblin electromancer and syncopate. Do u see it? Use it. Invisible stalker also, two of. Deff 4 gobbos. Sick deck otherwise.

October 6, 2012 7:32 p.m.

ak3036 says... #15

@OFABass I have used Goblin Electromancer and Syncopate before however after turn 3 my opponent can easily pay the mana cost. It would also mean that I would have to wait till turn 4 to play a spell (after casting Guttersnipe ) which isn't what I want in a fast deck like this

October 6, 2012 10:21 p.m.

theonyc says... #16

Thought Scour ? and no Snapcaster Mage ? wtf?

October 7, 2012 8:51 p.m.

ak3036 says... #17

@theonyc Read the Description

October 7, 2012 9:44 p.m.

theonyc says... #18

but for your deck, even the sucky Fleeting Distraction is a better draw card, instead i would up your other card draws

October 7, 2012 9:51 p.m.

shirtninja says... #19

Instead of Fleeting Distraction , they could run something better like Inaction Injunction , which at least locks a creature down for a turn so you have a chance to swing.

October 7, 2012 11:55 p.m.