Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
| Format | Legality |
| 1v1 Commander | Legal |
| Alchemy | Legal |
| Archenemy | Legal |
| Arena | Legal |
| Block Constructed | Legal |
| Brawl | Legal |
| Canadian Highlander | Legal |
| Casual | Legal |
| Commander / EDH | Legal |
| Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
| Custom | Legal |
| Duel Commander | Legal |
| Gladiator | Legal |
| Highlander | Legal |
| Historic | Legal |
| Legacy | Legal |
| Leviathan | Legal |
| Limited | Legal |
| Modern | Legal |
| Oathbreaker | Legal |
| Pioneer | Legal |
| Planechase | Legal |
| Pre-release | Legal |
| Quest Magic | Legal |
| Standard | Legal |
| Vanguard | Legal |
| Vintage | Legal |
Meeting of the Five
Sorcery
Exile the top ten cards of your library. You may cast spells with exactly three colours from among them this turn. Add . Spend this mana only to cast spells with exactly three colours.
Epicurus on Card creation challenge
1 year ago
TypicalTimmy, the last ability make it a definite maybe. However, the deck wouldn't qualify to use it as a companion, and there aren't enough 3-color spells to make use of the first ability (which is why Meeting of the Five isn't in that deck).
Epicurus on
Ramos Unsleeved
1 year ago
The fewer mono-colored spells, the better. I feel like you have too many of them in here. If you had more two-colored spells, I'd say add Niv-Mizzet Reborn. However, if you keep it at as many three-colored spells as you have or more, add Meeting of the Five.
A few other cards I can suggest (don't really have it memorized how expensive they are):
On a final note, if you want a five-colored deck to be at all competitive, you'll really need to spend a decent chunk of money on the land. It's pretty much unavoidable. Too many lands that ETB tapped will really put you a lot of turns behind.
Kazierts on Primers. For which decks you …
2 years ago
wallisface, that's what I normally aim with my titles. I personally dislike memey titles as cannot see what the goal of the deck is from them. Even in a recent deck I've been working on, Sins of the Brilliant Five, I've tried to use names of the cards I play, namely Sins of the Past, Meeting of the Five and Brilliant Ultimatum.
Similar to what I said in my other comment, what do you think of having a primer divided in small categories, such as in my Monoblack Infect [Competitive/Primer]? This way you can just go exactly where you want an there's no need to read things you don't want. However, I try to be as detailed as possible, so it might not appeal to you.
| Have (2) | orzhov_is_relatively_okay819 , JordanSanFran |
| Want (0) |