Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
Format | Legality |
1v1 Commander | Legal |
Archenemy | Legal |
Arena | Legal |
Block Constructed | Legal |
Canadian Highlander | Legal |
Casual | Legal |
Commander / EDH | Legal |
Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
Custom | Legal |
Duel Commander | Legal |
Gladiator | Legal |
Highlander | Legal |
Historic | Legal |
Legacy | Legal |
Leviathan | Legal |
Limited | Legal |
Modern | Legal |
Oathbreaker | Legal |
Pioneer | Legal |
Planechase | Legal |
Quest Magic | Legal |
Vanguard | Legal |
Vintage | Legal |
One with the Stars
Enchantment — Aura
Enchant creature of enchantment
Enchanted permanent is an enchantment and loses all other card types. (It has its abilities, but it's no longer a creature.)
griffstick on Alela, Artful Provocateur
3 weeks ago
bootsworthy on Self Treestruct
1 year ago
Oh, Fuzzy003, I thought that the exchange would be zero and not nothing, after reading these expanded upon rules where it says, “The enchanted permanent keeps its abilities but has no power or toughness. If one of its abilities refers to them, it uses 0,” about One with the Stars:
https://www.mtgassist.com/cards/Theros-Beyond-Death/One-with-the-Stars/rulings/
bootsworthy on Self Treestruct
1 year ago
Oh, Fuzzy003, I thought that the exchange would be zero and not nothing, after reading these expanded upon rules where it says, “The enchanted permanent keeps its abilities but has no power or toughness. If one of its abilities refers to them, it uses 0,” about One with the Stars:
https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=476310#:~:text=One%20with%20the%20Stars%20may,after%20the%20temporary%20effect%20expires.
bootsworthy on Self Treestruct
1 year ago
Oh, Fuzzy003, I thought that the exchange would be zero and not nothing, after reading these expanded upon rules where it says, “The enchanted permanent keeps its abilities but has no power or toughness. If one of its abilities refers to them, it uses 0,” about One with the Stars:
https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=476310#:~:text=One%20with%20the%20Stars%20may,after%20the%20temporary%20effect%20expires.
Fuzzy003 on Self Treestruct
1 year ago
Also One with the Stars doesn't work as the Trees' ability requires an exchange. If the tree has no toughness value to swap then the ability fizzles.
Coward_Token on Commander Legends: Battle for Baldur's …
1 year ago
Holy balls that's a lot of previewed cards, none of which I've ever seen before.
Mono-colored character commanders + Backgrounds is a good way of creating a new set of Partners without having to worry about synergy around the original ones. In the 99, the backgrounds seem to make pretty good pseudo-Auras for Voltron too.
I liked The Monarch so I expect to like The Initiative as well. The Undercity isn't super exciting (why single target burn and a glass cannon token for an EDH-specific set?) but the final room gives creature beatdown some love at least. I'm hoping that mono-white will receive some strong initiative cards, seeing as it's a color with both good evasive creatures and defense which places it in a good position to both take and keep the intitiative. I also hope there's some better dungeon reward cards this time around.
Bane's Invoker: I get that they wanted to make a mono-colored cycle that included all of the Dead Three, and that Bane is Lawful Evil, but mono-white still feels weird, especially when the flavor text uses the epiteth "The Lord of Darkness".
Abdel: Meh. Flash would have been cool here, especially at that cost.
Lulu: Seeing as wholesome and cute as she's supposed to be, it feels weird that she fits well at the helm of an Aristocrats deck. That smile ain't right either.
Commander Liara Portyr: Mmmm yes, I like this, even if she's slightly expensive. Beatdown support and boros card advantage? And it's impulsive draw where the risk of whiffing is greatly mitigated by built-in ramp, greatly ressembling Prosper, Tome-Bound while still doing it's own thing? Sorry, but allow me to indulge in a "Yasssss queen".
Fang Dragon: While it's at a humble common rarity, I could see this fitting in otherwise high-MV Dragon tribal decks for the decent Adventure part
Elminister: No surprise there. The -3 doesn't seem super appropriate for EDH but w/e, spellslinger scrying tribal sounds neat. Obviously, inspiration can be found in azorius Eligeth, Crossroads Augur decks
Raphael: Still waiting for a proper Demon tribal commander, a simple anthem with an evergreen keyword isn't going to cut it. Less personality than Zurzoth, Chaos Rider too
Myrkul: Hahah persist One with the Stars? That's so weird, I love it. You can tap out your dorks to cast a wrath, then tap their enchantment-copies to keep going!
Mazzy: Sigh, feels like the same mistake as Tiana, Ship's Caretaker; if Mazzy gets hit by a wrath, she's not going to be able to see the Auras fall off. Even if she could, Aura card's reliance on creatures is problematic, since you'll probably find yourself in situations where you first have to spend some mana on casting/creating a creature, then using whatever's left to save just some of the exiled Auras.
Battle Angels: Would it have been too good if it just said "more than you"?
Nautiloid Ship: neat that Vehicles are getting more EDH support, though reliance on mill feels a bit awkward
Tasha: Just one spell per "ultimate" activation! Cheecky synergy with her Laughter. Demon tokens kinda feels like flavor filler and I feel like she could cost one less seeing as she's quite slow and vulnerable, but w/e, still neat
Firkraag: I appreciate a good goader, but the Dragon tribal feels pretty incidental. Works with non-goad forced attacking for both your opponents' creatures (Goblin Spymaster) and your own (Hellraiser Goblin). (No Angel's Trumpet synergy tho.)
Cap' Ng...N'gh...whatever...: Feels like it'll be much more consistent than the often scarily big Umbris, Fear Manifest for Horror tribal
Nalia: Doesn't feel super white-black and go-wide beatdown isn't the best for EDH, but it's nice that party is getting some flavor-approprate love
DanMcSharp on
3 years ago
Sorin_Markov_1947 One with the Stars Refers to card type not creature type. Also, I'm not being condescending, merely giving you a good advice so you don't look silly again in the future. You just said something wrong because you assumed you were right without checking, that's all.
Sorin_Markov_1947 on
3 years ago
DanMcSharp The rules say you're right, but not for that reason. I could just as easily argue that One with the Stars demonstrates that extra text is needed to remove types, after all.
Perhaps apply your own arguments to your own side before being condescending to others, particularly experienced Magic players.
Have (0) | |
Want (1) | midget_overlord |