why is one banned but the other is not

Legacy forum

Posted on Feb. 9, 2014, 11:25 p.m. by swkelly89

i noticed that Windfall is on the banned list for legacy, but Whispering Madness is not, and is essentially the same card. why is this?

DrFunk27 says... #2

Converted Mana cost and Windfall is only take 1 U and Whispering Madness is Black U

February 9, 2014 11:33 p.m.

Slycne says... #3

The extra mana and the extra colored symbol make all the difference. It goes from being say a reliable draw 7 in decks with Lion's Eye Diamond and the like to something that's harder to set-up, slower and not as splash-able. It's much the same situation that a card like Ancestral Recall is in. It's not the effect itself that's broken, but the cost and efficiency. Though granted Ancestral Recall is on a whole other level.

February 9, 2014 11:38 p.m.

DaggerV says... #4

1 extra mana makes night and day different too.

February 9, 2014 11:39 p.m.

chicagobearz says... #5

This is why i love to play and keep up with legacy. They will bann cards like Windfall , Mental Misstep , Gush , Black Vise , the list goes on and only gets more intense with the mox set. There are very few cards that i would like to see off and on this list. I love Gush and I've thought for years now it should be un-banned, but blue is the power for now and this would only break it further. I am surprised they kept True-Name Nemesis around, being designed for group commander games, but i cant say i'm not happy about it staying legal. As to the question about thees two specific cards, Windfall can be cast in almost any deck. Put a dual or two, maybe a freeLotus Petal and bam, fresh hand. With Whispering Madness costing both U/B it limits the cards overall usefulness, and makes it more geared towards the mill/discard strategy. I have a casual mono green infect deck i love to put cards with great power that would you would not think of. Thinking "i'll just Lightning Bolt his Glistener Elf " and being met with a surprise Mental Misstep is great.

March 3, 2014 9:47 p.m.

KingSorin says... #6

This is like saying why is Lightning Bolt broken but not Searing Spear (or any of those things trying to mimic bolt)

March 4, 2014 5:40 a.m.

Sam_I_am says... #7

I noticed that Ancestral Recall is banned, but not Jace's Ingenuity They do the exact same thing! What's the deal?

March 4, 2014 12:59 p.m.

swkelly89 says... #8

Sam_I_am one costs 5 mana, the other just 1

March 4, 2014 1:12 p.m.

lookoutimscary says... #9

swkelly89- Excatly!, same concept with your situation.

March 4, 2014 1:23 p.m.

swkelly89 says... #10

lookoutimscary i learned =]

March 4, 2014 1:27 p.m.

Hahaha ok

March 4, 2014 1:35 p.m.

chaosjace says... #12

It bugs me that Strip Mine is banned but Wasteland isn't, I know WHY it is this way, but it bugs me, and they wont ban a two drop 9/10 with no drawbacks, but Mystical Tutor is banned.

September 7, 2014 5:12 p.m.

mckin says... #13

does it bug you black lotus is banned? or ancestral? i mean temporal mastery for miracle is like the same thing as timewalk so unban timewalk.

September 8, 2014 12:24 p.m.

chaosjace "two drop 9/10 with no drawbacks" what the hell kind of card is that?

September 24, 2014 10:32 a.m.

DrFunk27 says... #15

He is referring to Tarmogoyf.

September 24, 2014 10:51 a.m.

as a matter of fact, the most that 'Goyf can ever be is an 8/9, unless they added a new card supertype since the last time I checked. and I have literally never seen a 'Goyf get that damn big. it usually either gets killed off, or there's not enough card types in the 'yard to get it there.

September 24, 2014 10:56 a.m.

DrFunk27 says... #17

Playing Jund it's consistently a 5/6 or 6/7 by mid game. I've never seen one maxed out but it gets there.

September 24, 2014 10:59 a.m.

it'll get there quicker I bet with the Onslaught fetches now being Modern legal (thanks a lot, Khans... lol)

September 24, 2014 11 a.m.

DrFunk27 says... #19

The zendikar fetches were alreadyLegal. This won't speed up Goyfs process. Lol

September 24, 2014 11:07 a.m.

more fetches = more consistency

September 24, 2014 11:08 a.m.

This discussion has been closed