Boza Fine Deck Emporium

• Edit User
• Edit Profile
• Enable styles
• Disable styles
• Unblock user
• Block user
• Disable chat
• Enable chat
• Remove friend
• Add as friend
• Gift Tokens
• Settings

Well, I am at a loss then Falcoshin. It is kind of presumed you want feedback when you post here. Otherwise, why do it?

Plus, if 4 different people think you should take a card down a notch, maybe they have noticed something you haven't. But what am I saying?

None of those people actually "put enough thought into the card and refuse to admit it", in addition to "not playing the damn game" and lets not forget those people also lack "serious understanding of the game".

I know you are a great person who can discern people's abilities to play the game over the Internet, how much thought they quantitively put nto a card and compare it to the quantity you put in, and also discern the otherwise intangible understanding of the game. All in the most polite and cordial tones, of course.

The problem comes when you ask for feedback, receive it, yet dismiss it with "you have no serious understanding of the game". How do you expect that to generate any discussion?

Hey, Aurelia was a garbage card in the Standard it was printed in, so don't go comparing your card to it.

Additionally, the cards are not really comparable, as untapping your own and untapping others creatures are quite different things.

The fix is easy - just add "Sacrifice Syr marden, tournamnet champion" at the end. Make it a one-tme use thing.

Word of advise - refrain from submitting more than 1 idea - it is part of the design constraint to come up with one thing and polish it. And usually, if you have multiple ideas, neither will be polished enough.

Let me confirm that real quick - Gattison, all of the will be up to the GM of the week - the group can stumble onto a interplanar portal Bolas failed to find and be transpored to the Jetsons world.

ScionsStillLive - I will update the deck page as well with that (and additional rules), but basically, everyone who comments would have to friend me to be able to edit the deck. The weekly GM will archive the discussion to clean it up and the only post to show up would be his/hers with the newest story entry. Since anyone who participates can be the GM, it is best to just ask everybody to friend me.

Naturally, this means this will be entirely community driven and open to griefing, but I think the participating users will be above that.

I will be working to finalize both the deck and this page during this week and I will update you once done.

Just a note, I will be reviewing all the posts and making a decision tomorrow around this time. So, you have about 24 hours for your entries.

Pretty good despair mechanics so far! Tzefick - you can jump in and out of the game at any time, so do not worry about missing a couple.

To both, while it is fairly easy to guess, adding rarity to custom cards is a good idea. And I really appreciate the spoiler tags as it keeps the thread neat and tidy :)

Keep them coming, great job so far!

Great, some awesome suggestions! I will update the deck description as soon as possible and provide more re-read and clarify and structure everything better. I have relied on tagging users who commented previously to maintain interest from the previous thread as best as possible while hopefully improving user experience.

I will definetely add a section where everyone should send me a friend request, since you cannot edit the deck otherwise, which is bad. I want users to drive this crazy train as much as possible :)

The most interactive commander I can think of in these colors are the Shattergang Brothers . But Mathas is a suggestion I support even more.

Tagging TypicalTimmy, PepsiAddicted, Ziusdra, ScionsStillLive, CrowMutini, Caerwyn, MoonHollow124 who commented on the previous thread to weigh in on the version 2.0 of the game.

I knew there would be some kinks to work out, and I think this is the best way to do it.

Please join the new thread the-rpg-game-discussion-thread

Which incorporates some of the suggestions generated in this thread to the new format and allows for rules discussion before and after the game launch.

I will post the first challenge (might not even be the same one as the first iteration) in about a week to allow for time to iron out any issues here.

The RPG Game Discussion Thread is for any discussion related to The RPG Custom Card Game.

Any question you have outside the game, like the rules, can be posted here. You can also ask any questions.

I will be sure to nominate any participant as an editor for the deck, so that the winner can archive the story and post the new challenge (I need a friend request for that).

this is a variation of the excellent Myriad Landscape , but somehow even worse - takes 8 lands tapped over 6 turns to have the same oomph Myriad can generate with 3 lands over 3 turns.

Eh, this is not particularly good. I would say this is a mashup between Eldrazi Monument and 6 mana elspeth. I do not get the blue in her color identity though. None of the abilities are outside the realm of GW. Additionally, with Ghired raising the bar for token commanders.

I would make her 4GW and make the "copy token" ability on another condition - "when Norn attacks, create a token copy of that creature" or "when a +1/+1 counter is put on a creature token you control, create a copy of that token".

I would substitute fear (which does not jive well with assassins - you cannot fear what you do not see until it stabs you) with shadow. Which makes Kylar interesting - you make tokens with deathouch that cannot block normal creatures, until kylar him/herself dies.

The elite assassin has severe memory issues - you should not expect people in physdical card game to remember the next turn whether a certain cost was paid last turn or 5 turns ago. and the wording "poisonous 1 and haste until EOT" makes it seem it has poisonous 1 until end of turn, which I assume is not the intention.

Assanination has a problem - it is too bad without the contract. Not only do you get a discount, but you get an extra positive effect? I would cost it 2BB, the contract cost at BB, and make it so that the player who played ASSASSINATION loses 2 life.

Overall, the contract mechanic is not very good - it requires too much for a simple cost reduction. For example, you have to play an assassination in order to make a second assassination cost less, which is not cool.

As an alternative, you can sleeve one commander in a red sleeve, the other in a blue one, and the whole deck in purple ones.

For example, I sleeved Muldrotha, the Gravetide in Dragonshield petroleum sleeves, which are really reminiscent of mid-way point between blue, black and green.

Just to say, they are unlikely to be as good as the dragon shield art sleeves. Those things are monsters that take any kind of abuse. Any other sleeve with I have purchased barely lasts, so caveat emptor on non-dragonshield art sleeves.