Wow, completely forgot about card:Ranger's Guile. He's absolutely right, that'd be a much better choice.

I don't blame you, it's existence is a tightly kept secret. Now that you know, you may only tell others for the sake of deck improvement. wink wink, nudge nudge

Lol thanks guys, card:Ranger's Guile it is. Good call

What about Gnaw to the Bone as side deck? Its pretty usefull against BURN decks... I use it in my deck deck:golgari-power-of-the-grave-vegan-meal-1

By the way, +1 for U

This is like, netdecking x 9001. +1 for this deck(s) being vastly superior in the new standard. -1 though for no originality.

Originality doesn't usually win games. I'm not saying you should never come up with new and interesting strategies, but this is a very strong deck, and it's probably what's going to be played in the new standard. Yeah, personally I'd prefer it if Door to Nothingness decks were the biggest force in standard, but until pigs fly, that ain't gonna happen. (Although in Magic, pigs could very well fly.... I once had a flying firebreathing boar thanks to the power of enchantments. In a limited game, no less.)

If you want a pruely fun deck, here's my take on Search the City : The Relentless Search

D'oh! I forgot, I wanted to suggest adding in Arbor Elf for mana acceleration in place of Rakdos Cackler . I don't think the cackler is quite good enough on its own to warrant playing in a deck like this.

Arbor Elf is definitely strong with Overgrown Tomb , it could mean a card:Geralf's Messenger turn two. I like it, thanks

Or, even more easily, a T2 Dreg Mangler .

Beat meBant Mill...5-0. Good Lord Geralf' and Blood Artist are Relentless.my Spheres don't do enough. +1 Then again I didn't sideboard.still I dunno what i can do to stop it...Rest in Peace won't help against this monster.

@kingboo3000 I just realized that the only forests I run are the 4 Overgrown Tomb s. Arbor Elf might not be good unless I increase the number of Forests, which would hurt my primarily black mana base. Thoughts?

Ooooo.... That's not good at all.... I guess I would just increase the numbers on some of your awesome removal. Like maybe another Killing Wave , Tragic Slip , and Brimstone Volley ?

I have 13 removal spells, plus more in the SB. I'm gonna stick with Rakdos Cackler for now because he can be a creature card I can discard to pump Lotleth Troll . Not to mention he really isn't a bad 1 drop

Wouldn't Slitherhead be better than Rakdos Cackler in this deck?

I like that far better as well. Discard him for 3 +1/+1 counters on your troll.

In addition, Slitherhead is also a zombie, which could bring back Gravecrawler as well.

Slitherhead is definitely better here. Thanks for the suggestion :)

Check out the deck list Jund Zombie Hater. I would not mind a comment back. Seems very close to your list except the mana base feels a lot smoother in this linked list.

Definitely dump the Slitherhead . A 2/2 for 1 R/B is definitely better. Slitherhead has its upsides, but in a super fast aggressive zombie deck like this, you most definitely want to be swinging for at least 6 on turn three. You want to be straight smashing face every turn, not poking for 1, hoping he blocks it so then you can pump one of your other creatures. Definitely go for the Diregraf Ghoul or the Rakdos Cackler , leaning towards the ghoul. If you want, check out my deck for some ideas :). I've had a lot of success with it so far, mostly because I cut out the Blood Artist/Killing Wave combo. Don't get me wrong, the combo is sick, but a little inconsistent because its hard to predict exactly what your opponent chooses to sac/not sac. Instead, I just went for the straight, Aggro up the ass approach, and it's been working well.

Anyway, here's the deck: tappedout.net/mtg-decks/jund-aggro-17-09-12-1/

I disagree. You don't cast the Slitherheads...they are food for your troll furthermore the point of Blood Artist/Killing wave is sac' ing for zero and dumping your creatures at the right time. I have a very similar deck, its working quite well. First tourny is tomorrow.

So then it's a dead card in your hand until you draw a Troll? I'd much rather have a 2/2 beater on the field smacking my opponent than a 1/1 that could potentially combo well with another card. And no arguments with the blood artist/wave combo, but it's still a little inconsistent, as there are a few factors that need to come together to make that really good. But when it is good, it IS good

Or you can use it to chump block or let it die to Killing Wave .

Yeah, true. But again, I'd rather have a straight beater on the board, especially in a zombie deck that is supposed to be racing the opponent the whole game, and a 2/2 gets you there faster than a 1/1 that can then boost another creature. For example, what would you rather have on the field: say a Slitherhead and a Gravecrawler, or a Diregraf Ghoul and a Gravecrawler. Option 1 has some undeniable synergy, as you swing with the Crawler and chump block with the Head. But then you pump up your Crawler next turn and then they Searing Spear the Crawler, or Pillar it or whatever -- they remove it. Then you have nothing. With 2 2/2s on the field, your threats are spread out and therefore harder to deal with with only 1 Spear of Pillar or whatever they have. Obviously that's one example but it boils down to not putting all your eggs in one basket.

Yeah, true. But again, I'd rather have a straight beater on the board, especially in a zombie deck that is supposed to be racing the opponent the whole game, and a 2/2 gets you there faster than a 1/1 that can then boost another creature. For example, what would you rather have on the field: say a Slitherhead and a Gravecrawler, or a Diregraf Ghoul and a Gravecrawler. Option 1 has some undeniable synergy, as you swing with the Crawler and chump block with the Head. But then you pump up your Crawler next turn and then they Searing Spear the Crawler, or Pillar it or whatever -- they remove it. Then you have nothing. With 2 2/2s on the field, your threats are spread out and therefore harder to deal with with only 1 Spear of Pillar or whatever they have. Obviously that's one example but it boils down to not putting all your eggs in one basket.