Paper Pauper vs Pauper Online
Posted on Nov. 26, 2017, 1:41 a.m. by Profet93
Why is it that people like pauper online much more than paper pauper? Paper pauper barely costs anything in general (and compared to 1k-4k EDH decks). Is it that pauper online is so much more accessible (easier to find opponents) or is the price difference so great?
I've been making paper pauper decks in hopes of finding players who engage in the format but so far I am out of luck.
What are your thoughts on this?
Honestly it's WoTC's fault if anything. They refuse to sanction Pauper tournaments in paper, like Pauper GPs, PPTQs, etc. Which honestly makes no sense, as having a cheap, competitive format would be a great way to get new players into the game.
You could always try to run a Pauper league of your own at your LGS.