Sanctum Prelate in the format
Commander (EDH) forum
Posted on Dec. 18, 2016, 5:29 p.m. by JaceTheSwagSculptor
What do you guys think of Sanctum Prelate in EDH? If you have played it, what have been some of your notable experiences so far?
Thanks!
JaceTheSwagSculptor says... #3
Epochalyptik: Hmm...I didn't know this was already a thread. I guess I'll look for the original then. I appreciate the heads up.
December 18, 2016 6:06 p.m.
Epochalyptik says... #4
No, you posted two copies of it, one with this title and one with the title "Sanctum Prelate." I deleted the other one already.
December 18, 2016 6:21 p.m.
JaceTheSwagSculptor says... #5
Oh! I actually did not know I posted a second one. Thanks you for doing that.
December 18, 2016 9:24 p.m.
joshuaizac says... #6
wow...didn't even know that Sanctum Prelate was a thing. Now I wanna build a deck with that, Void Winnower & Chalice of the Void
...and maybe Isochron Scepter, Silence & Orim's Chant... crap even more ideas coming to mind for stuff I haven't the money for... damn you jace!
December 18, 2016 11:25 p.m.
Sim_Will_CMcantfindmehopefully says... #7
No! Bad joshuaizac!! We do not build Gaddock Teeg decks with a network of hard locks! No!
December 19, 2016 8:13 p.m.
JaceTheSwagSculptor says... #8
@joshuaizac: Just build the deck on Tappedout and you'll get over it. That's what I do when I come across a deck I don't have the money to build. I'm guessing this means you think the card is good lol.
December 20, 2016 7:15 a.m.
joshuaizac says... #9
@ JaceTheSwagSculptor yea I usually read through all the spoilers for a set as they come out....skipped over conspiracy 2. And yea I think this is a good card, albeit with limited niche usage. And I probably will build a Virtual Only deck with it.
Epochalyptik says... #2
The forums are configured to automatically reject a thread if it's a copy of a recent thread. Please don't repost your thread just to change the title or to correct another minor error; if you get a notification that you already posted a similar thread, use the existing thread instead.
December 18, 2016 5:42 p.m.