Nobody expects the Avacynian Inquisition!
Commander / EDH*
SCORE: 10 | 21 COMMENTS | 3847 VIEWS | IN 9 FOLDERS
WertomThree says... #2
Yes. Once tapped out lets me add her as the commander, I will replace Anya with Avacyn.
March 11, 2016 3:37 p.m.
Redninja09 says... #4
So rules wise you can play red in a commander deck like this?
March 24, 2016 11:29 p.m.
WertomThree says... #5
Yes, like how you can only use Elbrus, the Binding Blade Flip in black because Withengar Unbound is black. Since Avacyn, the Purifier is red, it counts in her color identity.
March 24, 2016 11:52 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #6
Heh, I used the same reference in my new!Avacyn deck description (link: Judgment Day: Avacyn the Purifier EDH). You get a +1 just for the name :D
March 30, 2016 3:12 a.m.
WertomThree says... #7
Thanks! I +1'd your deck as well. I like your idea of a Voltron Avacyn.
March 30, 2016 2:02 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #8
Even though we are playing her very differently, I like your approach as well of abusing board wipes when your creatures are indestructible :) the only suggestion I would make it to add more mana ramp, so you can get to 9 mana (5 for Avacyn, 4 for DoJ or WoG). Also, Blasphemous Act is wonderful and almost always costs just R ;)
March 30, 2016 2:43 p.m.
WertomThree says... #9
Thank you for the advice! I've added your suggestion along with Weathered Wayfarer and a few more rocks.
March 31, 2016 4:26 p.m.
If you use archangel avacyn as you commander, the deck has to be mono white just fyi
April 2, 2016 9:31 a.m.
WertomThree says... #11
Actually, since her flip is red, red is a part of her color identity. Which makes her white and red.
April 2, 2016 2:39 p.m.
A commander's identity depends on the mana symbols appeared on it's cmc and the decription part of the card. Since there is no red mana symbol appeared on that card, avacyn purifier remains the only red card you should see in this deck.
April 3, 2016 2:23 a.m.
Hope the rule of identification could change due to the release of avacyn
April 3, 2016 2:30 a.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #14
markszncd: I'm sorry, but you are incorrect about Avacyn's color identity. As a commander, her identity is WR. From the Comprehensive Rules (903.4c), "The back face of a double-faced card is included when determining a cards color identity."
She is Boros, and red cards are entirely legal in the deck. Here is the full citation as well: http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Color_identity
April 3, 2016 5:16 a.m.
Some cards to prevent Avacyn's damage to your creatures: Rune-Tail, Kitsune Ascendant, Mark of Asylum. If you're packing these, then go ahead and blow up the board with damage, add Anger of the Gods and Volcanic Fallout. Blasphemous Act was mentioned. Repercussion could be fun in here too.
Needs more lands.
April 19, 2016 3:14 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #16
For the purpose of dealing lots of damage to creatures, especially with Mark of Asylum and Repercussion on the field, I'd go with Blasphemous Act and Chain Reaction.
April 19, 2016 5:10 p.m.
WertomThree says... #17
Thanks guys for the help. I've added Chain Reaction and Volcanic Fallout. Mark of Asylum is already in the deck, and I'll test Repercussion to see if it hurts me more than it hurts them.
April 20, 2016 6:28 p.m.
Avacyn cant be your commander it has to be boros colors for your commander
February 2, 2017 10:49 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #19
Pdemi559: Avacyn's back side is red. Thus, card is boros.
February 2, 2017 11:01 p.m.
Daedalus19876 says... #21
Pdemi559: Glad to help :) I am also glad I didn't have to dig out the cRules citation because that document is a pain.
RubyOrzhov says... #1
Will the new Avacyn be your commander? If so, I am more interested.
March 11, 2016 2:56 p.m.