Pauper forum

Posted on May 6, 2016, 12:02 a.m. by Nickles

What would be best suited as an end game for this kind of deck in pauper? I'd be using Martyr of Ashes as a sweeper so non flying creatures with toughness less than 4 wouldn't be advisable.

VampireArmy says... #2

Coalhauler Swine seems sweet.

May 6, 2016 2:23 a.m.

Boza says... #3

Gatstaf Arsonists  Flip seems like the best choice from my view.

Hotheaded Giant is awesome. Ridge Rannet has extra utility early on.

May 6, 2016 8:40 a.m.

Nickles says... #4

Coalhauler Swine looks like the pauper version of Boros Reckoner, nice! In a deck that reacts on the opponent's turn, Gatstaf Arsonists  Flip looks pretty sweet too. Ahhh the choices. Thanks guys.

One other thing, was Mind Stone printed at common on MTGO ever? I know for paper it was. That would be a sweet rock to have. If not, are there any recommendations to fulfill that ramp slot?

May 6, 2016 11:01 a.m.

Boza says... #5

Yes, it is legal, printed in weatherlight as a common. NOt 100% sure weatherlight is online available, but IT should be.

May 6, 2016 11:30 a.m.

Iehovah says... #6

What about using Rakdos Signet?

May 6, 2016 11:33 a.m.

Nickles says... #7

I'm not sold on that particular signet, if I'm splashing a color it would most likely be blue for the card draw and Izzet Signet would be better. However, splashing a second color takes away the effectiveness of Martyr of Ashes.

I think the deck would have great creature based match-ups, but suffers heavily versus those that don't ie. Teachings, Tron, and Burn. What would be some sideboard options to handle those decks?

May 6, 2016 4:02 p.m.

Nickles says... #8

What do you guys think about Chartooth Cougar?

May 6, 2016 4:36 p.m.

Iehovah says... #9

My reason for suggesting the signet is because i thought that is the best 2 drop mana rock that wasn't a creature. Also i found a few creatures that might be interesting

Cinder Hellion seems like a decent beater

Ember Beast and Frostburn Weird might help in in filling out the curve

May 9, 2016 1:14 a.m.

This discussion has been closed