Animorphs, Soul of Aximili-Esgarrouth-Isthill

Commander / EDH DudeMan1031

SCORE: 10 | 7 COMMENTS | 1010 VIEWS | IN 4 FOLDERS


CavemanlyMan says... #1

I would suggest Cunning Evasion over Temur Sabertooth . That would, however, remove a creature, and I don’t know how much importance you are placing on that.

Also, every Animar deck should have Ancestral Statue in it, as it is a one card combo with animar. You just have to have 4 or more counters on animar and you can bounce the statue infinitely to your hand. The same thing can be accomplished with Cloudstone Curio and a morph.

Check out my Animorph deck.CavemanlyMan

September 23, 2019 10:38 a.m.

DudeMan1031 says... #2

Cunning Evasion is a bad card, full stop. Obviously Ancestral Statue and Cloudstone Curio are auto-adds for the deck, which are exactly why I don't run them. I don't want to play the same copy-pasted infinite-combo deck as every other animar player.

September 23, 2019 10:53 p.m.

MrXilas says... #3

I'm just here to upvote the Animorphs reference.

January 2, 2021 6:30 p.m.

Last_Laugh says... #4

Beastcaller Savant, Cloud of Faeries, and Peregrine Drake will also work in Cloudstone combos alongside morph.

Feel free to check out my list for ideas. It's not morph (has a few) but has several combo lines for Cloudstone Curio in it. Upvotes on any of my decks are appreciated. Animar, Gaea's Hemorrhoid ⫷PRIMER⫸

October 23, 2021 1:15 p.m.

DudeMan1031 says... #5

None of those cards have morph and I'm not running Cloudstone. Feel free to check out my deck description before copy-pasting the same tired combo pieces.

October 24, 2021 7:07 p.m.

Last_Laugh says... #6

You're welcome... dick! I sincerely hope you get no more help after that fucked up, uncalled for, and ungrateful response. Welcome to ignore.

October 24, 2021 7:34 p.m.

CavemanlyMan says... #7

Last_Laugh He's got a point. He isn't running Cloudstone Curio, and while he doesn't make any kind of mention of it in his description, which is odd since he referenced said description, that doesn't mean you should call him a dick for it. If you're being honest, you probably spent about 30 seconds looking at the deck to find the pieces in your deck the he didn't have, and then didn't even bother to notice that he wasn't running the card that your deck hinges on. Then you posted the differences hoping to get good karma and views for your own deck. If you just spent a couple more minutes trying to understand the goal of a deck you wouldn't end up getting responses like that.

It's nice getting feedback on decks, but if you don't actually care about the deck enough to try to improve it based on the goal of that deck, then don't go advertising your deck on other people's pages.

October 25, 2021 6:10 p.m.

Please login to comment