Minimum number of Merfolk for Silvergill Adept ?

Deck Help forum

Posted on May 16, 2018, 4:49 p.m. by Lame_Duck


Tramampoline! Trambopoline!

Legacy Lame_Duck

SCORE: 22 | 26 COMMENTS | 5279 VIEWS | IN 6 FOLDERS


is a Wizard flicker deck in which I've been using Wall of Omens for card draw but now, with the printing of Naban, Dean of Iteration, I want to replace it with a Wizard, namely Silvergill Adept. Any suggestions on the minimum number of Merfolk the deck needs to be able to reliably support it?

Bulldawg1310 says... #2

If youre not running aether vial, you really should only be running silvergil in merfolk builds so you almost never have to pay the tax. Theres really not a mathematically correct number of merfolk to make silvergil manageable. Now, you could build a merolk/wizard tribal, and probably be okay. you could run the new Merfolk Trickster, Cursecatcher, Harbinger of the Tides, Stonybrook Banneret, and Master of Waves

May 16, 2018 6:56 p.m.

xcn says... #3

Master + Naban could be funny.

May 17, 2018 2:16 a.m.

Lame_Duck says... #4

Well, sure, I wasn't suggesting I'd just jam it in the deck without adding more Merfolk Wizards but, at a certain point, if I'm adding inferior creatures just because they're Merfolk, it stops being worth it to include Silvergill Adept. That's why I was looking for advice from people as to the right number of fishies to balance the benefits of Adept against the costs of warping my deck around it.

May 17, 2018 7:26 a.m.

Please login to comment