Please login to comment
Well, why would they revisit an unpopular plane?
December 4, 2019 6:27 a.m.
As far as wording the card to make sense in the rules, I think something like this would work:
If a Planeswalker would enter the battlefield under enchanted player's control with one or more loyalty counters, it enters the battlefield with that many minus two loyalty counters instead. Then sacrifice Powerless."
December 2, 2019 7:07 a.m. Edited.
I think modifying loyalty is an reasonably interesting design space but there's a few issues with this card. Firstly, a minor thing but they're called Planeswalkers; plainswalkers would be things like Zodiac Rooster .
Secondly, as designed, this card wouldn't actually do anything. The Planeswalker would have to already be on the battlefield to be a target for this Aura, so it would never trigger. Also, there's no such thing as negative loyalty counters, it would have to be worded as a replacement effect that changed the Planeswalker to add fewer loyalty counters when it entered. I'm not actually sure how you would have to phrase it for it to make sense in the rules.
Finally, I don't understand why you added the exile replacement, it just seems to make the card more complicated without meaningfully changing its design.
December 2, 2019 6:45 a.m.
Yes, that would work. You could also do it in the declare attackers step, after attackers have been declared. Basically combat goes:
Beginning of combat step priority > Declare attackers > Priority > Declare blockers > Order blockers > Priority > Deal combat damage > Priority > End of combat step priority
November 30, 2019 4 p.m.
You can do that but a player only gets priority in the combat damage step after damage has been dealt, so activating Knight of the Ebon Legion at that point won't cause it to deal any extra damage and Settle the Wreckage won't prevent any of the combat damage.
Edit: the last time you get priority before combat damage is dealt is in the declare blocker step, after blockers have been declared.
November 30, 2019 6:03 a.m. Edited.
SCORE: 18 | 10 COMMENTS | 2621 VIEWS | IN 11 FOLDERS
SCORE: 42 | 47 COMMENTS | 10678 VIEWS | IN 32 FOLDERS
SCORE: 13 | 13 COMMENTS | 1337 VIEWS | IN 4 FOLDERS
SCORE: 7 | 678 VIEWS | IN 5 FOLDERS
SCORE: 9 | 1 COMMENT | 722 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER
SCORE: 72 | 73 COMMENTS | 8683 VIEWS | IN 34 FOLDERS
|Avg. deck rating||10.50|
|Suppressed formats||Commander / EDH|
|Good Card Suggestions||153|
|Last activity||4 days|