Sorry, edit to the above post, just realised that you dread return angel of glory's rise

Veil of summer? List looking good my dude, would be great to see an update on the win cons, but I think I pretty well get it. I played the list back when angel was in it before. Finale pretty much to just fetch hermit druid or hulk (assuming you just have copious amounts of mana)? Guessing the same with neoform? The thought of combing off on opponents end step or in response to an opponents combo sounds lit. I'll definitely have to try that out.

So with the new thassa’s oracle, it seems like the new hulk pile is going to be oracle, nomads en-kor, and cephalid illusionist. This allows us to win at instant speed, get around graveyard hate, still for the most part nullify removal, and cut the graveyard package which will open up slots. Although, I’m not sure because then we are losing hermit Druid, another way to mill our library.

DeadlyPro_21 i was thinking the same thing so i built a list for it! Basically a combination of breakfast and sacred hulk. Please leave feedback if you like the list! Oracle Hulk

Why is Finale of Devastation worth running? More than, say, Sylvan Tutor.

So is this just another dead deck now because of the flash ban

F

A while ago I read your first win condition (dump graveyard + renimate Muldrotha, the Gravetide + LED + Phantasmal Image), and I thought it was interesting that you said "This is a loop that can be used to net every time we execute it. Once we have an arbitrarily high amount of mana, we can start filtering it into Mana of any colour. Now that we have infinite Mana of every color."

I thought of correcting you and wrongly commenting "Hey! That's not infinite mana of EVERY color because you need to spend to generate , one infinity will always be smaller than the other infinities." But after some thinking I had a revelation and knew you were right. That was the first time I encountered this fact, and now I'm studying this fact in my higher mathematics course at my university. In the 1600s, Galileo Galilei observed that it is possible for two infinite sets to be the same size even though one is an infinite subset of the other. For example, the set of the natural numbers (1,2,3,4,5,...) has a 1-1 correspondence with the set of integers (0,1,-1,2,-2,...), even though the set of natural numbers is contained in the set of integers. They're the same size of infinity! It's beautiful that so much mathematics is implicit in this game.