Combos Browse all Suggest
Legality
Format | Legality |
1v1 Commander | Legal |
Arena | Legal |
Block Constructed | Legal |
Canadian Highlander | Legal |
Casual | Legal |
Commander / EDH | Legal |
Commander: Rule 0 | Legal |
Custom | Legal |
Duel Commander | Legal |
Gladiator | Legal |
Highlander | Legal |
Historic | Legal |
Legacy | Legal |
Leviathan | Legal |
Limited | Legal |
Modern | Legal |
Oathbreaker | Legal |
Quest Magic | Legal |
Tiny Leaders | Legal |
Vintage | Legal |
Goldberry, River-Daughter
Legendary Creature — Nymph
: Move a counter of each kind not on Goldberry, River-Daughter from another target permanent you control onto Goldberry.
, : Move on or more counters from Goldberry onto another target permanent you control. If you do, draw a card.
CamraMaan on Clarification on Goldberry, River-Daughter
4 months ago
Sorry, this is another seemingly silly question, but... when I use the first ability of Goldberry, River-Daughter while she has no +1/+1 counters on her, but I have five other creatures with +1/+1 counters on them, I'm assuming she will get one +1/+1 counter from each of them, correct? The other option being only one... if she was taking a counter from each creature as individual actions on the stack, then I would expect only one, as each resolution on the stack would then see she already has one. But with all five coming from one ability resolving on the stack, she should get all five, correct?
NV_1980 on Sisay's Horny Spaceship
9 months ago
Ok, I would start by cutting the cards of which the abilities are too specific to ever really work in a game. Here are first ones I would choose and why:
- Blood Hypnotist: your list only contains three other cards that generate blood-tokens. The likelihood of her ability ever being used is therefore rather slim.
- Cascade Seer: bit of an expensive-to-cast scry opportunity when at most you can get Scry 2 (your party thus far cannot include anything else than 1 of 10 wizards and 1 of 5 clerics).
- Dragonsguard Elite: with so few non-permanents in the deck (thus far), this one may not be worth it.
- Gluttonous Guest: would not include this for similar reason as Blood Hypnotist.
- Goldberry, River-Daughter: though I love the beauty of this card, her abilities aren't of much use to you because your deck barely creates counters.
- Guardians of Oboro: would not use this for similar reason as for Goldberry (you have a few auras, but so few that this ability will probably never trigger).
- Kasla, the Broken Halo: good combatant but since there's nothing else with convoke in here, her ability is pretty useless.
- Kiora, Sovereign of the Deep: there are no krakens, serpents, etc. in this deck, so aside from being a decent combatant, she's not doing much.
- Mesa Enchantress: almost no enchantments?
- Rime Tender: no snow permanents?
- Setessan Petitioner: with so few green permanents in the deck, not sure if this is worth it.
- Spellstutter Sprite: having doubts about this one. Not many faeries in this deck, but then again it's quite common these days to cast spells with CMC0, so ...
- Sublime Archangel: lovely card but in a deck with this many creatures, I would assume you're going wide, right? That would mean 'Exalted' mechanic is not all that great. Or am I missing something?
Angels, Elves, Faeries and Vampires seem to be the main creature-types you're using. Maybe just focus on these types and make it easier to create some synergies? Or is this too functional?