Cascade Seer

Creature — Merfolk Wizard

When Cascade Seer enters the battlefield, scry X, where X is the number of creatures in your party. (Your party consists of up to four creatures, one Cleric, Rogue, Warrior and Wizard, each.)

Legality

Format	Legality
1v1 Commander	Legal
Alchemy	Legal
Archenemy	Legal
Arena	Legal
Block Constructed	Legal
Brawl	Legal
Canadian Highlander	Legal
Casual	Legal
Commander / EDH	Legal
Commander: Rule 0	Legal
Custom	Legal
Duel Commander	Legal
Gladiator	Legal
Highlander	Legal
Historic	Legal
Legacy	Legal
Leviathan	Legal
Limited	Legal
Modern	Legal
Oathbreaker	Legal
Pauper	Legal
Pauper Duel Commander	Legal
Pauper EDH	Legal
Pioneer	Legal
Planechase	Legal
Pre-release	Legal
Quest Magic	Legal
Standard	Legal
Vanguard	Legal
Vintage	Legal

Discussion (3)

NV_1980 on Sisay's Horny Spaceship

9 months ago

Ok, I would start by cutting the cards of which the abilities are too specific to ever really work in a game. Here are first ones I would choose and why:

• Blood Hypnotist: your list only contains three other cards that generate blood-tokens. The likelihood of her ability ever being used is therefore rather slim.
• Cascade Seer: bit of an expensive-to-cast scry opportunity when at most you can get Scry 2 (your party thus far cannot include anything else than 1 of 10 wizards and 1 of 5 clerics).
• Dragonsguard Elite: with so few non-permanents in the deck (thus far), this one may not be worth it.
• Gluttonous Guest: would not include this for similar reason as Blood Hypnotist.
• Goldberry, River-Daughter: though I love the beauty of this card, her abilities aren't of much use to you because your deck barely creates counters.
• Guardians of Oboro: would not use this for similar reason as for Goldberry (you have a few auras, but so few that this ability will probably never trigger).
• Kasla, the Broken Halo: good combatant but since there's nothing else with convoke in here, her ability is pretty useless.
• Kiora, Sovereign of the Deep: there are no krakens, serpents, etc. in this deck, so aside from being a decent combatant, she's not doing much.
• Mesa Enchantress: almost no enchantments?
• Rime Tender: no snow permanents?
• Setessan Petitioner: with so few green permanents in the deck, not sure if this is worth it.
• Spellstutter Sprite: having doubts about this one. Not many faeries in this deck, but then again it's quite common these days to cast spells with CMC0, so ...
• Sublime Archangel: lovely card but in a deck with this many creatures, I would assume you're going wide, right? That would mean 'Exalted' mechanic is not all that great. Or am I missing something?

Angels, Elves, Faeries and Vampires seem to be the main creature-types you're using. Maybe just focus on these types and make it easier to create some synergies? Or is this too functional?

Gattison on eyes2sky

2 years ago

sorry, forget the Cascade Seer lol, instead i'd like 2x Maelstrom Colossus

Gattison on eyes2sky

2 years ago

2x Cascade Seer, 2x Powerstone Shard plz

Also, a lot of your pauper deck links are "broken" in case you didn't know