Btw you should name the deck Bipolar Babies because all the creatures are little and they all have a hybrid mana cost.
July 4, 2015 4:31 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #3
Oh, wow, didn't even notice that "lol."
I'm too lazy to fix it. XD
And I might change the name to that, would probably warrant more views. Thank you! :)
July 4, 2015 5:19 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #6
I would totally run that, but it would put the deck over $20, and I hate pain lands with a burning passion. XD
Thanks though, and let me know if you ever think of something else. :)
July 5, 2015 4:19 a.m.
NoviceMagician says... #8
Ugh, I didn't sleep at all last night. Anyway:
@TheAlexGnan, I would totally run those, but both would render the deck no longer a hyper budget due to their price. Thank you though, and let me know if you ever think of anything else.
@Nef, sure, why the hell not. But I don't feel like explaining it in the description.
Thanks guys. :)
July 5, 2015 1:47 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #10
Okay, so I just changed the name. This new one will serve as a place holder until I get a better idea.
July 6, 2015 7:23 p.m.
Serendipitous_Hummingbird says... #11
I wonder if you might consider moving the Dryad Militant's into the main board so you can run Brave the Elements main board
July 9, 2015 12:27 a.m.
NoviceMagician says... #12
@Serendipitous_Hummingbird, I think I'd rather just run Emerge Unscathed since it has rebound and I only need to target one creature. And Dryad is more of a deck matchup only thing to stop grave abuse and snapcaster, which makes it more of sideboard material.
So would you suggest main boarding Emerge Unscathed? And if so, what could I actively drop for it?
July 9, 2015 12:33 a.m.
Serendipitous_Hummingbird says... #13
I'd drop a few Unholy strengths. It's copies 5-8 of Gambit and when you are suiting up creatures with something as fragile as enchantments you need to be able to protect your creatures.
July 9, 2015 1:11 a.m.
NoviceMagician says... #14
Makes sense, Unholy Strength tended to not be drawn for some reason anyway. This is mean to be casual, which is why I didn't run that much protection, (trust me, I know how to build competitive XD), but I'll go ahead and throw some more protection in anyway.
Thanks much. :)
July 9, 2015 1:47 a.m.
Serendipitous_Hummingbird says... #15
or honestly what about o-ring? sometimes you need removal
July 9, 2015 12:30 p.m.
durzostarfire says... #16
Boros Recruit?? first strike can be helpful.
Looking great though +1
July 9, 2015 1:08 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #17
@Serendipitous_Hummingbird, removal isn't much of a problem as long as I keep my Voltron creature evasive. I'll go ahead and throw in into the maybeboard though and test with it. Thanks!
@durzostarfire, Boros Recruit was in the deck prior to being made public, but was switched out for Judge's Familiar. First strike is nice and all, but the damage guarentee from flying is better. Thanks!
Thank you both again! :)
July 9, 2015 1:37 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #19
"This is a hyperbudget deck. What that means is that the deck price has to be $20 or less, and the sideboard (if applicable) has to be $5 or less."
They are too expensive. Sorry you got stuck behind me on the advertise thread, but thanks for the suggestions anyway! :)
July 13, 2015 10:45 p.m.
The protection spells are nonbos with your auras as they cause them to fall off if you name protection of the auras colours.
July 15, 2015 4:28 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #21
I know, but they also protect my creature from three entire colors, green, blue, and red. Which is pretty baller.
July 15, 2015 4:35 p.m.
LordOfDispair says... #22
In a deck this unusual, I'm not sure exactly what to suggest, but this looks like a blast to play, and with a pricetag less than a deckbuilder's toolkit.
+1
July 18, 2015 3:16 p.m.
NoviceMagician says... #24
Does anyone know why those decks are appearing to the left of comments?
Nef says... #1
"Predator's Gambit not only gives your creature an extra +2/+1, which is a solid buff, but it also has a conditional damage guarentee. And seeing how this is a voltron, chances are you'lol meet the requirement for intimidate to kick in."
I believe you meant to put you'll not you'lol
July 4, 2015 4:29 p.m.