Seance token copies

Asked by harrydemon117 13 years ago

Seance allows me to exile a creature from my graveyard and create a token that's a copy of said card. If I were to copy said token (i.e. Phantasmal ImageMTG Card: Phantasmal Image, Phyrexian MetamorphMTG Card: Phyrexian Metamorph, Cackling CounterpartMTG Card: Cackling Counterpart), will the copy of that token get exiled too?

...or is it just the effect of seance itself that exiles the first token?

S3L3KA says... Accepted answer #1

SeanceMTG Card: Seance

In short, no. Only the tokens that are created by Seance are affected by its requirements.

The image is a completely seperate object and only copies the information off of the card it copies, not any other affects pertaining to it.

If Seance said,

'That token gains "Exile this creature at the beginning of your End Step"'

we'd have a different situation. :)

February 21, 2012 4:50 p.m.

Rhadamanthus says... #2

A copy effect copies everything written on the original, plus any characteristics from copy effects the original is currently subject to. The copy you make of the SeanceMTG Card: Seance token will be a copy of the original and also have the Spirit creature type, but the "exile it" part of SeanceMTG Card: Seance's effect isn't a copiable value. Your non-SeanceMTG Card: Seance copy won't be exiled at the end of the turn.

February 21, 2012 4:52 p.m.

harrydemon117 says... #3

So if I bring back Essence of the WildMTG Card: Essence of the Wild during my upkeep, and then use Lingering SoulsMTG Card: Lingering Souls the two tokens copy Essence of the WildMTG Card: Essence of the Wild and are not exiled?

This might make for a use for SeanceMTG Card: Seance FINALLY!!!

February 23, 2012 9:28 a.m.

Rhadamanthus says... #4

That's correct. SeanceMTG Card: Seance is a very subtle and complicated card, and there are a lot of things the card doesn't say, but its quirks give it a very unique role if you build the right deck for it (hell yeah, MulldrifterMTG Card: Mulldrifter and friends).

February 23, 2012 9:31 a.m.

This discussion has been closed