enpc [Text goes here]

• Edit User
• Edit Profile
• Enable styles
• Disable styles
• Unblock user
• Block user
• Disable chat
• Enable chat
• Remove friend
• Add as friend
• Gift Tokens
• Settings

Iron Ascension: A Custom Set

Custom* Benthehen333

3 COMMENTS | 11 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER

Please post here if you want to comment.

I've gone ahead and closed these. I am unable to delete a thread, however closing them will suffice.

^^ that one

I'm glad to see you putting together an actual set - I see a lot of cards here which are just mythic rares out of context so it's good to see you attempting a range of cards which actually provides balance.

With regards to the Spark Phoenix trigger - I don't think that the way it's worded will work. When an object changes zones, it basically becomes a new instance of itself, menaing that the Spark Phoenix in your graveyard will not remember it attacking or not attacking. You may have to use wording more like

"At the beginning of your upkeep, if you didn't attack with any creatures named Spark Phoenix, you may return Spark Phoenix from your graveyard to your hand."

Unfortunately this means that if you have multiple Spark Phoenixes they will negatively interact with each other, however wihtout using some sort of token exchange, I don't think there will be a cleaner way to do this (not to mention the word space on the card).

Is your primary ramp goingto be coming from fetching additional lands or from rocks/dorks (not that you can't have both)? This will give you a bit of an idea about filling out the ramp portion of the deck.

For any permission based deck, having repeatable card draw is super important. Cards like Mystic Archaeologist and Whispers of the Muse will be good for sinking lots of mana into. You may also want to look into cards like Prismite to help you convert the stored colourless mana back into coloured mana.

gotta use HTML to do that. There are some good tutorials here: w3schools HTML Images

you can use the width property of the image and set it to 100%:

<img src="source goes here" alt="alt text" width=100%>

you can also force the image size by giving the width (and height) in pixels, eg. 200px

hejtmane: The reason I was suggesting Aggravated Assault was not actually because of the extra combat phases. While you can run a bunch of card which generate enough mana that you can keep attacking, the big thing that the card does is for 5 mana it untaps all of your creatures. Even if you completely ignore the combat steps and just straight up win through Impact Tremors or something else, with Skirk Prospector and Krenko you only need 3 other goblins to run the loop. And at 4 other goblins you go both infinite on both goblin tokens and red mana.

Breath of Fury is an easy enough to stop combo since you just have to block the enchanted creature, so it shouldn't draw too much hate (though this is entirely dependent on your playgroup). And if the token is huge then chances are you're already in a good place to win.

You could also look at using Aggravated Assault as another line with Skirk Prospector. At worst, it's "pay five, untap Krenko", but it does so much more than this.

In future, please remember to ask rules questions in the Rules Q&A portion of the forum.

To answer your quesiton though - yes, you can do what you're asking. The "An opponent gains control of Wishclaw Talisman" is part of the effect of the ability, not the cost. So there is nothing stopping you from putting multiple search triggers on the stack by untapping Wishclaw Talisman. Similarly, you could copy the activated ability and achieve the same effect (though there are much fewer cards which let you do that).

The important thing is that you can't let any of them resolve until you've stacked as many as you can, otherwise you break the chain (since you can't activate abiliities of cards you don't control) and can't continue to put the abilities on the stack (though the existing ones will still resolve).

Please have a read of the Formatting Tips page (you'll also find a link to this just under the comment input text box). It has explanations on how to properly link decks, players, cards, etc. correctly using the Tapped out syntax.

Please remember to link all cards in your question: Rabid Bite

As a general rule, when performing the actions dictated by a card, you should follow exactly what it says in the order it's written and no more, no less. So if a card doesn't say to tap a creature as either part of the spell's cost or its effect, then you can assume that you wouldn't have to.

The only restriction with cards like Channel is that you can't pay life that you don't have. So for example, you can't pay 50 life if you only have 20. Other than that, the card works as it is written, so your friend didn't do anything wrong. There's a reason banlists exist.

I think you're trying to push too many ideas here and so your deck feels jumbled. You have infinite mana on your commander, however you can't pay generic costs with said mana menaing that Umbral Mantle doesn't work here. You also have Freed from the Real meaning that the blue mana you do produce is going to be consumed in the generation portion of the loop (so you won't have it for things like card draw).

It also looks like your only real win conditions are Jace, Wielder of Mysteries and Praetor's Grasp (which you've only got one way to recur - tasigur).

You need to make sure you have a clear win condition, preferably with some sort of redundancy on each of the pieces. Also, just cramming all 10 talismans seems bad, especially since your commander can't pay for any of them. And Untaidake, the Cloud Keeper is not a good card, period.

If you're straight up looking to sell cards, you should include the following:

• Denomination (I get that this is usually USD, however you should be clear)

• Sender location (city/state/country - please don't post your full address here)

• Any shipping restrictions

The simple point is, if you're concerned that people will judge you about a playmat that you A) feel that you have to justify why it's ok (and in this case your justification isn't a good one) and B) have deemed the picture to be inappropriate enough that you were unwilling to post it here should be enough information to answer your own question.

And of top of all of that, things like this are part of the reason that MtG players get a bad reputation and it's attitudes like this that drive women away from the game.