Please help me trim the deck down?

General forum

Posted on March 5, 2011, 11:14 p.m. by Immortalhighlander

11 mountain 2 kazuul, tyrant of the cliffs 2 spin engine 2 goblin arsonist 3 lightening bolt 3 koth's courier 1 chandra nalaar 3 red sun's zenith 2 burn the impure 3 blisterstick shaman 2 melt terrain 2 fire servant 2 chandra's outrage 2 metallic mastery 2 negate 2 paralyzing grasp 1 wall of frost 3 preordain 1 tome scour 2 renegade doppelganger 2 sea gate oracle 2 quicksilver geyser 2 steel sabotage 2 foresee 4 neurok commando 2 mirran spy 2 call to mind 10 island 1 drowned catacomb

Help me trim it down to 60-65 cards. Thanks.

mafteechr says... #2

You should build the deck, then create a post in the forums with a link.

This does not belong in Q&A.

March 5, 2011 11:42 p.m.

Tezz says... #3

Even thought, like what mafteechr said, this is not supposed to be asked here I'll just give you a start point.

For starters, the lands 22 seems like good but, if you have some, change the Melt Terrain s for Tectonic Edge s, you'll appreciate those extra manas to cast Chandra or the Zenith.

That one Chandra Nalaar seems ok.

As for creatures keep it to 2 goblin arsonist, 1 wall of frost, 2 renegade doppelganger, 2 sea gate oracle, 4 neurok commando, 2 spin engine, 2 spin engineand and if you can change 3 blisterstick shaman to 2 Cunning Sparkmage and 2 fire servant to 3 kiln fiend, your firepower will increase a lot.

For the sorceries/instants 3 red sun's zenith, 3 lightening bolt, 2 paralyzing grasp, 3 preordain, 2 call to mind, 2 negate, 2 foresee and switch the 2 quicksilver geyser for Into the Roil same effect plus draw.

To finish sideboard the 2 Steel Sabotage , 2 Kazuul, Tyrant of the Cliffs & 2 Burn the Impure . These will be sweet against specific decks but pretty useless against everything else.

That makes 60 and 6 SB. Advice you on testing and considering some more aggro spells like Searing Blaze .

March 6, 2011 12:09 a.m.

xeratheenigma says... #4

moved to general forums

~Xera

March 6, 2011 5:21 a.m.

This discussion has been closed