Dude read the description before you post redundant comments

i like how the maybeboard is a deck on its own... as far as certain people who don't believe in the spirit of edh go, my Elbrus, the Binding Blade  ^Flip is in a similar place

I agree with PC (Planeswalker Commander) due to similarity to PC (Player Character) Also, I'm a vote towards keeping Command Tower and the like. I also agree with the notion that there should not be Planeswalkers in a given deck of this type that share a subtype with the Commander. This is actually very much like my idea of a variant where in addition to a Planeswalker Commander, the deck was also used to play Planechase, and your commander also had 0: Planeswalk.

I absolutely love the concept of a Planeswalker as a Commander, because then I don't have to be bothered about the Commander being surrounded by creatures and spells from unrelated planes, etc. as much.

Hmm, 0: Planeswalk and/or perhaps whenever your commander leaves the battlefield, Planeswalk. Also, fyi, Blind Eternities Map was intended when referring to incorporating Planechase.

I have considered allowing Command Tower since it is specifically for EDH. I think I'll need to hear more opinions on this before I add it to the list, but I'm keeping an open mind. =)

If enough people agree about it then I'll add that any Planeswalker in the deck cannot share a subtype with the Commander. Thanks for the suggestion!

In theory I like the idea of only 80 cards but in reality I think it would be to....well predictable and thus become lame so I say stick to 100 you can find 20 more cards to add heck 6-7 of that 20 should be lands so that's only 13-14 more cards

Your commander has to be a legendary creature: it can't be a planeswalker

You fail to realize that the only thing capable of preventing him/her from playing with a Planeswalker as his/her Commander is merely who will play the same way against him/her.

Count_Bathspounge_Phd if you read the deck description you would know we are discussing playing "plainswalker EDH" so your little comment is invalid

So you built an Oathbreaker deck, but thought up your own rules, and now this isn’t EDH or Oathbreaker legal. Even tagged it as an EDH deck. I read your description, so don’t refer me to it. Go look up Oathbreaker.