Seer of Stolen Sight

Combos Browse all Suggest

Legality

Format Legality
1v1 Commander Legal
Alchemy Legal
Archenemy Legal
Arena Legal
Block Constructed Legal
Brawl Legal
Canadian Highlander Legal
Casual Legal
Commander / EDH Legal
Commander: Rule 0 Legal
Custom Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Gladiator Legal
Highlander Legal
Historic Legal
Legacy Legal
Leviathan Legal
Limited Legal
Modern Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Pioneer Legal
Planechase Legal
Pre-release Legal
Quest Magic Legal
Standard Legal
Tiny Leaders Legal
Vanguard Legal
Vintage Legal

Seer of Stolen Sight

Creature — Phyrexian Warlock

Menace (This creature can't be blocked except by two or more creatures.)

Whenever one or more artifacts and/or creatures you control are put into a graveyard from the battlefield, surveil 1. (Look at the top card of your library. You may put that card into your graveyard.)

CamraMaan on Interaction between Araumi of the …

6 months ago

Ahhh, good to know! Ok, so each encore activation links the created tokens to the same sacrifice event... that makes sense, but I hadn't realized that before. That being said, with multiple encored creatures creating multiple groups of tokens that all get sacrificed at the beginning of the end step, do I still have the option to rearrange the order of which creature is sacrificed when, or does each group of tokens all get put on the stack together one after another, then the next chosen group, etc? Like with the example above, can I alternate between Aphetto Alchemist and Seer of Stolen Sight triggers on the stack? Or is it simply that one group goes on the stack and then the next?

CamraMaan on Interaction between Araumi of the …

6 months ago

That being said, if Seer of Stolen Sight's text did not say "one or more", would they trigger individually for each...?

CamraMaan on Interaction between Araumi of the …

6 months ago

Since all the Aphetto Alchemists and all the Seer of Stolen Sights are encored and being sacrificed simultaneously, all six sacrifices will be seen as just one event to each Seer, correct? And thank you for the help, this one apparently still has me slightly confused and still learning.

Rhadamanthus on Interaction between Araumi of the …

6 months ago

With the way Encore works, the Aphetto Alchemist copies get sacrificed at the same time. Each Seer of Stolen Sight will only trigger once for the event, not three times each.

Here are the detailed rules for Encore. Note that they don't say the copies gain "sacrifice [this] at ...", rather it's a single delayed triggered ability that instructs you to sacrifice all of them.

702.141. Encore
702.141a Encore is an activated ability that functions while the card with encore is in a graveyard. “Encore [cost]” means “[Cost], Exile this card from your graveyard: For each opponent, create a token that’s a copy of this card that attacks that opponent this turn if able. The tokens gain haste. Sacrifice them at the beginning of the next end step. Activate only as a sorcery.”

CamraMaan on Interaction between Araumi of the …

6 months ago

I know this will be a point of contention at the kitchen table, so some preemptive clarity on the matter is in order, plus I'm only 95% how it should turn out. Let's say Araumi of the Dead Tide let me encore Aphetto Alchemist and Seer of Stolen Sight. At the beginning of my end step they all go on the stack to be sacrificed in any order I want, and we'll say the Aphetto Alchemists are sacrificed first. My assumption is that each Seer of Stolen Sight will trigger separately for each creature sacrifice as it resolves on the stack. The other possibility is that since Seer of Stolen Sight says "one or more" it could be that they only trigger once (each), since all the creatures being sacrificed are leaving the battlefield "at the same time". I know a few of my friends will argue this. I would a month ago too. But now I'm pretty sure that as each creature sac resolves on the stack, each other creature triggers appropriately putting triggers on the stack, which resolve before the next encore sacrifice trigger resolves. So in this case, the "or more" portion won't make any difference. Correct...?

TIA!