Ghoulcaller's dream

Pauper passimo

SCORE: 64 | 19 COMMENTS | 10253 VIEWS | IN 54 FOLDERS


Nameless Inversion —Nov. 19, 2017

Added 2 Nameless Inversions and replaced the Unearths with 2 Ghoulcaller's Chants. The new instant can be used multiple times

passimo says... #1

Hey guys do you think that replacing 1 Victim of Night with Nameless Inversion and the 2 Unearth with 2 more Ghoulcaller's Chant would be good? Doing so I'd be able to take back the inversion from the graveyard to play it again, being it also a zombie card

August 18, 2017 4:56 a.m.

Arthaiser says... #2

this deck looks very good, but i have to say, i like asphodel, but he is in another mana curve entirely, the rest of the deck can be played at 2 mana, since the few cards that actually cost more are better if we cycle them (most of the time).

even the sb stops at 2 and the maybeboard so i have been thinking... maybe asphodel has to go? and maybe 2 lands have to go with him? a deck that caps at 2 usually plays 16 lands. but maybe this deck needs more mana than the average 2 drop deck so i am not that sure about that.

as for the additions in these hypotetical slots, 2 more Ghoulcaller's Chant are mandatory in my opinion, if you take the lands also, i can see Nameless Inversion there. in fact i can see that card in the deck more than Disfigure or maybe 50% of each.

just my two cents, please tell what you think about them.

September 14, 2017 1:27 p.m.

passimo says... #3

Hi Arthaiser, thanks a lot for your suggestions. I think you are right about the Merchant, but i love that card, and i'm not sure i'd be able to part from it! I'll test the deck anyway, so I can see how it would go without that card.

Thanks for letting me know your opinion about the Nameless Inversion/Ghoulcaller's Chant swap! I think i'll put it in. I was honestly thinking of replacing only 1 Victim of Night with it, because it costs exactly the same converted mana cost as the inversion, but i'm not so sure about it, also because it would be difficoult to find it in the deck. Should I remove also 1 Disfigure, in your opinion?

September 20, 2017 3:20 p.m.

Arthaiser says... #4

i cant say anything for sure, but i think that is all about the mana that you usually have open. if the deck can leave 2 mana open and still do something in each turn then -1 Disfigure or maybe even more. but if that is too much mana then you have to keep them for the aggresive decks

September 21, 2017 7:45 a.m.

passimo says... #5

Ok, thanks a lot for your suggestions

September 24, 2017 7:17 a.m.