Gidgetimer
Deckspert -
Please login to comment
Said on
Going beyond 40 …...
#2
Bruh, Three Visits has had 8 printings in the last 4 years. It isn't rare because of P3K anymore. It is still >$5 because it is good and the printings weren't large, but it isn't the chase card it once was.
November 3, 2024 9:34 p.m.
Said on
Why is WotC …...
#3
"I hope this doesn't seem too disagreeable, but I don't know how you can argue Commander doesn't have some fairly strict rules about decks..."
My comment was in direct response to someone using the format philosophy to try and backup that Tutors are antithetical to the format and quoting "promote an environment where players are not pressured to conform to any specific method of deckbuilding" to me. I realize that the social contract imposes deck building restrictions. As a matter of fact I specified "You just have to make sure that everyone's expectations are the same within a pod".
If you don't want to include tutors, that is fine. If you don't want to play against tutors, let me know. If you want to act like you are somehow playing a more "pure" version of commander or that commander isn't for me because I run tutors, get out of here with that.
October 28, 2024 11:29 p.m.
Followers
PookandPie — merrowMania — Raging_Squiggle — JDGM — Alsatio — Boscoe — prophet_beast14 — kiryux — wedge22 — mtguser2000MTG Decks
Oloro's Alternate Wincons
Commander / EDH
SCORE: 12 | 15 COMMENTS | 4818 VIEWS | IN 3 FOLDERS
The "A" Team (Tayam Rube Goldberg Combo)
Commander / EDH
SCORE: 19 | 14 COMMENTS | 2070 VIEWS | IN 5 FOLDERS
Arcum's Even More Budget Asylum
Commander / EDH*
SCORE: 5 | 200 VIEWS
Private Poland (Budget RW Hero)
Standard
SCORE: 22 | 30 COMMENTS | 5284 VIEWS | IN 10 FOLDERS
Crusaders of the Lost Tokens
Casual
SCORE: 5 | 7 COMMENTS | 1114 VIEWS | IN 2 FOLDERS
48 Card Belcher
Legacy
SCORE: 13 | 24 COMMENTS | 2070 VIEWS | IN 3 FOLDERS
Twisted Image Combo
Casual
SCORE: 3 | 2 COMMENTS | 2666 VIEWS | IN 2 FOLDERS
Cubes
| Finished Decks | 47 |
| Prototype Decks | 22 |
| Drafts | 0 |
| Playing since | Dragon's Maze |
| Avg. deck rating | 6.62 |
| T/O Rank | 56 |
| Helper Rank | 71 |
| Cards suggested / good suggestions | 170 / 129 |
| Joined | 11 years |
Said on New Blocking Rule …...
#1Current rules are unintuitive and create feel bads for beginners is the reasoning I figured. Until the rules change goes into effect someone can:
Attack with a 4/6
Get blocked by 2 2/2s
Choose damage assignment order
Have defending player cast Giant Growth on first creature in order
Lose their creature while not killing any blockers despite having damage to kill one of them
Not having a round of priority between blockers being ordered and damage being dealt would also reduce the feel bads. But just completely removing damage assignment order accomplishes the same thing without having to create a new turn based action.
November 8, 2024 6:06 p.m.