Rivals of Ixalan: Pauper Review

Pauper forum

Posted on Dec. 31, 2017, 11:54 p.m. by StardustDragon11

Hi, I am going to try to review all of the cards of Rivals that are Pauper legal.

River Darter

a 2/3 for three that has really bad evasion. Draft fodder 1/5

Evolving Wilds

You know it, you tolerate it, it is the best fetch in the format. 4/5

Swab Goblin

A bear with two good types. Goblin and Pirate may become important tribes but it is a little too vanilla for anything really competitive unless Pirates are seriously pushed in Rivals.

Vraska's Champion

One toughness away from being okay. Only having one black mana symbol hurts it a lot too. Deathtouch would be nice but it is really good on small creatures with minimal investment, being on a large creature with a large investment is silly and not very good.

1/5

Cinder Barrens

Woooo another reprint of a tap lands. 2/5

I will update this as more cards are spoiled.

MollyMab says... #2

Why make an entire new thread for 4 cards, with no links, and what amounts to two paragrapghs of writing which says nothing. Reviews within the wheelhouse of pauper or whatever need to be more than just this is a card and needs to talk about its role in the wider format. What it compares too. What makes it bad etc.

I give your review 2/10.

January 1, 2018 8 a.m.

Boza says... #3

I agree with the above comment - it is not that it is not needed, but it needs a lot more attention to detail than it currently has. Now, Pauper is an established format and very little from Rivals is likely to impact it.

I have personally done a couple of articles on "cards in set useful in Pauper" and found that rather than listing everything and 75% having a score of 1/5 or 2/5, just list the good things.

Anybody who has any interest in Pauper probably knows that Cinder Barrens is not really a factor, so just omit it.

TLDR: Wait for full spoiler, then give us just the good stuff.

P.S. I have not written a Pauper article in while, may do one on Ixalan block.

January 2, 2018 4:08 a.m. Edited.

Please login to comment