Please login to comment

Said on How Do You …...

#1

I'm not very interested in Sieges, as they're basically just spells that make your opponent gain life, which makes sense that they're almost unplayable in constructed. They were fun in draft, though. What worries me is that Wizards often sees one success and proceeds to overfeed the idea, or one failure and throws the idea out entirely; which would be a shame, because I'm interested in what they do with battles you play on your own side of the field.

I'd put them somewhere in the area of Cartouches and Fortifications in terms of card type; Not against them returning but not exactly asking for them, either.

March 25, 2024 8:54 p.m.

Said on How Do You …...

#2

As someone who has a Magus Lucea Kane deck, it does have some upsides over normal copying, like copying the as well for abilities like Ravenous. That being said, it is a bit of a pain to track in paper. I have a problem with mechanics like that which are clearly designed for digital; Suspect immediately comes to mind. However, an expensive copy spell is much less feel bad than an expensive Clone that is vulnerable to removal, and outside that I can go either way on them. I didn't think this was a design space that could really be contentious.

March 25, 2024 12:01 a.m.

MTG Decks

Zed(ruu)'s dead, baby

Commander / EDH SteelSentry

SCORE: 2 | 208 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER

Chewing the Scenery

Commander / EDH SteelSentry

SCORE: 1 | 124 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER

Finished Decks 84
Prototype Decks 68
Drafts 0
Avg. deck rating 2.00
T/O Rank 120
Helper Rank 143
Favorite formats Commander / EDH, Limited
Cards suggested / good suggestions 1 / 0
Joined 7 years