Santiago1011
Deckling -
Please login to comment
Said on
Liesa, Angel of …...
#2
No problem clircrazy :) While I think Cosmos Elixir would work really well in tandem with Well of Lost Dreams , it doesn't really compare in terms of card advantage. It would be another incentive for our opponents to hit us. It's definitely viable, but it's lower power than WoLD.
I take that as a compliment jonno.scott haha. I didn't want to go super mean stacks..
February 11, 2021 10:24 p.m.
Decks
Liesa, Angel of Monsters and Masochism [PRIMER]
Commander / EDH
SCORE: 89 | 50 COMMENTS | 5564 VIEWS | IN 30 FOLDERS
Karametra, Selesnya Stompy [PRIMER]
Commander / EDH
SCORE: 20 | 9 COMMENTS | 2825 VIEWS | IN 6 FOLDERS
Teysa Karlov's Council of Aristocrats
Commander / EDH
SCORE: 6 | 474 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER
Finished Decks | 18 |
Prototype Decks | 9 |
Drafts | 0 |
Playing since | Innistrad |
Points | 180 |
Avg. deck rating | 38.00 |
T/O Rank | 246 |
Helper Rank | 568 |
Favorite formats | Commander / EDH |
Suppressed formats | Standard, Legacy, Pre-release, MTGO, Unformat, Unknown, Heirloom, Vintage, Archenemy, Planechase, Vanguard, Modern, Pauper, Noble, Casual, Hero, Quest Magic RPG, Quest Magic, Block Constructed, Limited, Duel Commander, Tiny Leaders, Highlander, Magic Duels, Penny Dreadful, Frontier, Leviathan, 1v1 Commander, Pauper EDH, Canadian Highlander, Brawl, Arena, Oathbreaker, Custom, Oldschool 93/94, Pioneer, Historic, Jumpstart |
Good Card Suggestions | 2 |
Last activity | 6 days |
Joined | 5 years |
Said on Liesa, Angel of …...
#1Thanks for the compliment Wedjat ;) I don't have any memorable games against intense aggro, but I'd say it's about a 35/65 chance I could keep myself safe. Not the best chance, but we have to remember that our commander has lifelink (to mitigate incoming damage) and that due to the nature of commander, intense aggro is an uphill battle with the two additional players.
I have considered SC, and I don't like it specifically because I haven't had the intense target put on my head much.
February 19, 2021 1:17 p.m.