Competitive Ruler Doesn't Update
TappedOut forum
Posted on Aug. 19, 2021, 5:43 p.m. by RelinquishedAttempts
Hello, I have made a few decks on this site and after first creating them, I have had them go under a lot of revisions.
Recently I noticed after doing a lot of changes that the competitive ruler hadn't moved a smidge. I wanted to test whether or not this was because I hadn't made any qualitative changes or not, but then I realized that from the first time making the deck to now, the ruler hadn't changed at all. I made a new deck and copied and pasted one of my current decks exactly as it is on my other deck and the ruler that showed was very different. For reference, Call the Colossus, my original deck, and Updated Competitive Ruler for Call the Colossus show a 84% casual rating for the original and 50% casual when updated.
I just think this is an issue because it is misrepresenting my deck and I don't want to make a different listing for that deck.
Could this please be fixed?
Necrosis24 says... #3
I agree it isn’t an end all be all. I’m sure they just use a comparison of cards in your deck with cards that appear in cedh decklists from comptetive play. I could probably build a highly focused budget deck that is listed at 90% casual.
August 19, 2021 9:32 p.m.
RelinquishedAttempts says... #4
Yeah, you guys are right, I guess was just thinking of the vanity in it all.
August 20, 2021 11:14 a.m.
it is strange... do you happen to remember if you made major changes since your deck got the ranking?
August 20, 2021 11:59 a.m. Edited.
RelinquishedAttempts says... #6
I had made major changes since first making the deck and getting the ranking. At least 15 cards have changed since first getting the competitive/casual ranking.
August 20, 2021 12:50 p.m.
ahh okay.... i think i have found the problem. it is possible we didn't have information on those cards that you added so the deck began to slide towards the ambiguous middle again and there was a bug in another change we made that was failing to update the original deck.
August 20, 2021 12:58 p.m.
RelinquishedAttempts says... #8
thank you for looking into this somewhat more benign problem.
Grubbernaut says... #2
It's a vestigial feature. Personally, I'd rather they nix it than devote limited time and resources into a meter that's relatively subjective in the first place.
August 19, 2021 6:29 p.m.