Leyline of Sanctity

Legacy forum

Posted on May 30, 2015, 9:11 a.m. by ChrisH

Hello,

I am entering the format today with a modified Modern Burn list (the store allows 15 proxies). I'm wondering what my sideboard should look like, and specifically if I should watch out for Leyline of Sanctity. Any other general legacy tips would be appreciated.

Cheers

2gherkins says... #2

Destructive Revelry is good against leyline

May 30, 2015 9:43 a.m.

EndStepTop says... #3

Nope. In legacy you can't afford to run such narrow hate, you should be worried about Stone blade decks fetching bskull and Jitte and gaining life. MirAcles can set up countertop and counter all your burn spells. Delver decks may try and outrace you, as will most combo decks. Leyline is the least of your worries.

May 30, 2015 9:52 a.m. Edited.

kyuuri117 says... #4

I disagree, Destructive Revelry is a very good two of in burns sideboard. It deals with Splinter Twin, Amulet of Vigor, Leyline of Sanctity, affinity, and other random stuff. Definitely put two in your board.

May 30, 2015 1:44 p.m.

EndStepTop says... #5

This is for legacy, there's better options for burn.

May 30, 2015 1:55 p.m.

julianjmoss says... #6

Smash to smithereens and destructive revelry are good and not narrow at all as they deal with almost every hate card. The sideboard for burn is pretty strait forwards because you try and limit interaction as much as possible. Grim lavamancer is also good

May 30, 2015 2:03 p.m.

kyuuri117 says... #7

Ohhhh legacy, right, didn't check the forum. Just saw it on the recent posts on the right of the homepage. Yea, don't run Destructive Rev.

May 30, 2015 2:16 p.m.

xzavierx says... #8

smash to smithereens is your best option, i would probably keep 2-3 in your side.

otherwise leyline is good but doesnt see wide legacy play b/c it typically needs to be a 4 of in the side.

if your meta has a lot stick with smash to smithereens. and probably another sulfuric vortex to passively deal damage with your creatures.

May 31, 2015 5:18 p.m.

This discussion has been closed