Skeleton

Custom Cards forum

Posted on May 13, 2010, 3:46 p.m. by mistergreen527

Sorok:

C-W-01 C-W-02 C-W-03 C-W-04 C-W-05 C-W-06 C-W-07 C-W-08 C-W-09 C-B-01 C-B-02 C-B-03 C-R-01 C-R-02 C-R-03 C-WB-01 C-WR-01 C-WBR-01 C-L-01 U-W-01 U-W-02 U-W-03 U-W-04 U-W-05 U-B-01 U-R-01 U-WB-01 U-BR-01 U-WBR-01 U-WBR-02 U-L-01 R-W-01 R-W-02 R-W-03 R-W-04 R-W-05 R-W-06 R-B-01 R-R-01 R-WBR-01 R-WBR-02 M-WBR-01 M-WBR-02 M-???-?? (Planeswalker)

Xander574 says... #2

I think planeswalkers should be just clasified as mythic for now.

May 13, 2010 5:21 p.m.

Xander574 says... #3

oh though reading it over, i think both red and black should have one more slot per uncommon and rare each. Or at least red has one more uncommon,and black has one more rare. or vice versa

May 13, 2010 5:40 p.m.

Xander574 says... #4

(i forget if this is goblins or samurai, but if its goblins red needs a much larger presence)(if its samurai never mind. but i think there was a desiciion that samurai would make a much better control class with URW, and goblins being the weird controlled chaos made more sense to be in WRB)

May 13, 2010 5:53 p.m.

Xander574 says... #5

never mind i had it backwards this is the samurai group

May 13, 2010 6:02 p.m.

mistergreen527 says... #6

I was actually surprised to see that, in Shards of Alara, the side colors for each shard didn't get very much representation. Upping the uncommon and rare counts for the side colors by one each and decreasing the uncommon and rare counts for the main color by two sounds doable.

May 13, 2010 8:51 p.m.

TAMA says... #7

Good skeleton. Sit. Stay. Play Dead... oh.

But seriously I think that should be fine for Sorok. I think we should keep in mind the broader picture of doing a block in which case we have room to maneuver.

May 13, 2010 9:29 p.m.

Lord007 says... #8

deck-large:infinite-rug-burn

October 26, 2013 6:43 p.m.

jonhydude says... #9

This has been done before, so I believe it.

October 26, 2013 6:50 p.m.

Lord007 says... #10

I've only found one other deck on tapped out that does it like this in standard.

October 26, 2013 6:51 p.m.

SwiftDeath says... #11

I haven't seen this before but I can still believe it. I like the combo and it is a great use of $1 rares. I can't see this being competitive yet but in a non-budget form it is possible. As is, it is a great casual deck and looks like fun to play.

October 26, 2013 9:28 p.m.

Rheunon says... #12

I really like this deck, i already have some of the components, I'm probably gonna make it. Thanks! 1+ :)

October 26, 2013 9:34 p.m.

Lord007 says... #13

No problem gale50000000

SwiftDeath if money wasn't a problem are there any changes that I didn't mention in the description that you would make to it?

October 26, 2013 10:06 p.m.

SwiftDeath says... #14

maybe capitalize on your defenders and use Axebane Guardian which will also allow you to use Hidden Strings as long as you control one other defender. You could also think about alternate win cons like using Burst of Strength as a way to super pump you arcanist. Maybe have some additional disruption to help resolve your combo. Your opponent is going to definitely board in Pithing Needle so you need an answer to that for games 2-3. I recommend Destructive Revelry as it allows you to answer Detention Sphere too. You also need to have answers to cards like Blood Baron of Vizkopa but you can easily get a Mizzium Mortars to handle that which also deals with Stormbreath Dragon and Loxodon Smiter . And last a possible Prophet of Kruphix to use the arcanist more often, play your spells while your opponent is tapped out, or be able to grind them down with Zhur-Taa Druid .

I have no Idea if these are good suggestions I can only speculate without doing extensive testing but these appear to be the weak points. I am unsure what to remove for reasons stated above but I think you can find a good balance and make the deck run a lot smoother.

October 27, 2013 2:20 a.m.

This discussion has been closed