Please login to comment
Did they mess with the formatting syntax? Oblivion Ring is showing up as LRW for some reason. I have also noticed on other decks that x + Y is not showing up as card links at all.
January 16, 2017 2:14 p.m.
January 15, 2017 11:35 p.m.
No you didn't but I did manage to miss your comment sorry. It is in fact a human creature card. Look at the card link you posted for more current errata. I just like the older versions since I have been playing since Mirage block. My playset I pulled from boosters when Urza's block first came out. Why replace with new ones? Back then things weren't as standardized as they are now. They said Summon on a lot of them instead of Creature and never included more than one creature type ie human cleric minion such as Priest of Gix is.
January 15, 2017 10:49 p.m.
I don't play commander/EDH but I had thought about it before. I would imagine that you would have to have a way of tutoring up what you need since there is a definite lack of variations of cards that are needed. For example, even with the lack non-land mana generators and using something like Mana Severance and lands you would still be stuck with only two cards to self mill fast enough Undercity Informer and Balustrade Spy. As I noted above it is best to have one of these in your opening hand. Instead of a 8/60 or 2/15 chance you are looking at a 2/100 or 1/50 chance of getting one. There are many cases like this. Also there are no sideboards in Commander/EDH so you would have to have the sideboard in your main deck leaving you with even more cards you likely wouldn't want on turn 1. I am not saying it is impossible to do but would be extremely difficult. You could likely take the sideboard (with a replacement for the 2nd Oblivion Ring I know there is something that would work I just can't think of the card off the top of my head) and build a deck around it. It would be quite different and though the end result may be the same it would work quite differently getting there. There is also the lack of good 5 color commanders for a deck like this. The commander would likely end up just being for show.
January 15, 2017 10:36 p.m.
What I don't understand, why I asked my previous question, is 3 Cabal Therapy's. I have done a lot of research on this sort of deck over the last couple years in order to make Demoralizer. I know my deck is quite a bit different but if you have 3 of the cards that need to be in your graveyard in hand instead why not just mulligan? I mean In certain and likely fairly rare instances you could get those 3 and a 4 card combo as well but is it worth it?
January 12, 2017 8:47 p.m.
January 12, 2017 8:37 p.m.
Thanks! The final draft, I guess you could call it, has been complete since July/August-ish. I had been working on it for about a year and a half prior to then.
January 8, 2017 5:16 p.m.
SCORE: 8 | 12 COMMENTS | 820 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER
SCORE: 3 | 395 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER
SCORE: 3 | 11 COMMENTS | 780 VIEWS | IN 1 FOLDER
SCORE: 1 | 72 VIEWS
SCORE: 31 | 22 COMMENTS | 1375 VIEWS | IN 11 FOLDERS
|Avg. deck rating||11.00|
|Helper Rank||None yet|
|Last activity||6 days|